Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: [SR and synchronization] Cognitive Dissonances and Mental Blockage Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:22:08 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 55 Message-ID: References: <17f07ef6b2cab9eb$615722$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <17f093a70d87b977$760537$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <17f0d1f84336d9cd$768489$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:22:08 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0bc100f5050f6c852213e21dd186125e"; logging-data="1058124"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/KGBtsGi4/zFtXQOwHWRZr" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:2Uzp+8FO7BOw+daQUEJ/n78/4bM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <17f0d1f84336d9cd$768489$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3298 Le 31/08/2024 à 15:05, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 31.08.2024 o 14:19, Python pisze: >> Le 30/08/2024 à 20:03, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> W dniu 30.08.2024 o 17:09, Python pisze: >>>> Le 30/08/2024 à 13:44, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>>> ... >>>>> No theory of mathematics include clocks. >>>> >>>> Sure! But a model of clocks can appear in a mathematical >>>> theory. >>> >>> It can >> >> Good to know. We agree then. >> >>> and, what's more important - a >>> relativistic idiot like to invoke >>> the auyhority of mathematics for >>> excusing his mad claims. >>> BTW - is Pythagorean theorem a >>> "hard mathematical fact"? >>> Yes or not? >> >> The hard mathematical fact is: Euclid's Axioms => Pythagorean theorem. >> >> Another question? > > Here it comes: > Quoting: > >> Paragraph I.1. describes a procedure that looks non symmetric at > >> first sight: clocks A and B are not treated exactly the same way > >> (two measures for A, one for B for instance), nevertheless at the > >> end of the day one can *prove* that the results are symmetric and > >> that inverting A and B would lead to the same result. > > > This is hard mathematical facts Richard. Something beyond your head. > End of quoting. > > No axioms now implying that? We basically need a archimedian complete ordered field. i.e. R. Let's pick ZFC + Peano, and R (for values of the "clocks") defined as the set of Cauchy sequences on Q or Dedekind's cuts. You may know the definition of Q, N, and Peano's axioms that I won't repeat here. > Just a hard mathematical fact? Definitely. > -- > poor stinker