Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:12:33 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Content-Language: pl
From: Maciej Wozniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
Subject: A short proof of the inconsistency of The Shit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 22
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.hasname.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 15:12:32 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1110
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <17ee15afea6b29a3$410850$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 1553


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second
As seen, the definition of second loved so
much to be invoked by relativistic morons -
wasn't valid in the time when their idiot guru
lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was ordinary
1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.


Now: an observer moving with c/2 wrt
solar system is measuring the length
of solar day. What is the result predicted
by the Einsteinian physics?
One prediction is - 99766. From the
postulates. The second prediction is -
86400. From definition.
And similiarly with the prediction of
a measurement of a meridian.


Thank you for your attention, poor
relativistic fanatics, have a nice day.