Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Python (was Re: I did not inhale)
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 17:06:05 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <vavbgu$124lb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <va4aut$3q4g0$1@dont-email.me>
 <va4fbr$3qvij$1@dont-email.me> <va5108$3tmmd$1@dont-email.me>
 <va51ok$3tqr9$1@dont-email.me> <va5ec2$3vluh$1@dont-email.me>
 <va6q4g$c1a7$1@dont-email.me> <va6rpa$c6bg$1@dont-email.me>
 <va6se9$cb8e$1@dont-email.me> <20240826083330.00004760@gmail.com>
 <vaises$2k7o6$2@dont-email.me> <20240826155113.000005ba@gmail.com>
 <wwvo75eicla.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vak9k9$2ujrs$1@dont-email.me>
 <valgpu$34s18$1@dont-email.me> <87y14hd4bk.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <valnei$35rt8$2@dont-email.me> <87ikvlcs7i.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vamclm$3c4ke$1@dont-email.me> <87ttf4bdcx.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vaoaak$3l470$3@dont-email.me> <875xrkb2iq.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <vaoibg$3m9tm$2@dont-email.me> <vapo6l$3v4l8$2@dont-email.me>
 <vatlqv$mhl0$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2024 17:06:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3820a5a5a2d09da681b5b14bf37b4c3d";
	logging-data="1118891"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+yMZoQZZmiHKfIvYfbHKCIkssLYf67ejQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dRbA8Q6EE82zekI3QGH41LynzMI=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <vatlqv$mhl0$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2492

On 31/08/2024 01:49, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2024 14:05:41 +0200, David Brown wrote:
> 
>> ... put in so much extra
>> crap and silliness that readers get caught up in that instead of
>> noticing that most of the function is meaningless.
> 
> Interesting. Now you are trying to claim that, because you don’t
> understand what the code does, that makes it somehow “meaningless”?

I covered that in an earlier post.  If you didn't bother reading it 
earlier, why should I bother posting it again?

To be fair, it's possible that what you posted was only part of a real 
function.