Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 01:45:49 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 03:45:50 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="21007ff653f86c504df6150519feb2b2"; logging-data="1085545"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18XPr+W1/8aHBylv3B/OOTE" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3Bixk82jt1QnUNl1whg5CqwfRP8= Bytes: 1839 On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 01:16:11 +0200, Janis Papanagnou wrote: > On 13.10.2024 23:10, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:28:32 +0200, Janis Papanagnou wrote: >> >>> You know there's formal definitions for what constitutes languages. >> >> Not really. For example, some have preferred the term “notation” >> instead of “language”. > > A "notation" is not the same as a [formal (or informal)] "language". > > (Frankly, I don't know where you're coming from ... : A programming language is a system of notation for writing computer programs.