Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!jik4.kamens.us!ngp.big-8.org!robomod!not-for-mail X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to ngp@ngp.big-8.org X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical complaints to ngp-admin@ngp.big-8.org X-NGP-Info-3: Send complaints about policy to ngp-board@ngp.big-8.org X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article. X-Robomod: STUMP Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:16:58 CST DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 jik4.kamens.us 49UL72B51226900 Authentication-Results: jik4.kamens.us; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=panix.com header.i=@panix.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=panix header.b=k9uRMvyh Delivered-To: news-groups-proposals@moderators.isc.org Authentication-Results: mod-relay-1.kamens.us; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=panix.com header.i=@panix.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=panix header.b=k9uRMvyh; dkim-atps=neutral DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=panix.com; s=panix; t=1730322420; bh=rU6FX+nbsagKc+NF9WJS81YOBQvRVXerp91p7nMpDr0=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:References; b=k9uRMvyhNtRP69szUl5c7INp6VFjkZaAxke3wnjJX+HTQpLq7LTl/hdOVK236pssS wqANv6j8e8xQG25CiQLCgEvTmPDEbAdkSRwlbxYaNXltmCoN8+lm6CLsh3fu0610ar cUTj4mYcb9WRzOvjvyuB9G39palCzhTrDl5RfwMc= From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals,news.groups Subject: Re: Moderator Vacancy Investigation: comp.os.plan9 Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Message-ID: References: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 Approved: NGP Approval Key X-Approval-Mod: tmiller Lines: 21 X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.groups.proposals iH0EABECAD0WIQSH6so/GGyIEkxgFjWs+RBu6T2F2wUCZyK+ah8cbmdwLWFwcHJv dmFsLWtleUBuZ3AuYmlnLTgub3JnAAoJEKz5EG7pPYXbAggAoMJzyklMN4acJ98o O6z1m0CYgkqXAJ0Xp+G79e2mW8coZ7Y5ZhPtIlJpow== =y7cC Bytes: 2988 In article , Steve Bonine wrote: >Big-8 Management Board wrote: >> This is a formal Moderator Vacancy Investigation (MVI), begun >> because the moderated newsgroup comp.os.plan9 is not functioning, >> and has been abandoned by its moderator. > >I am sincerely curious. > >The moderator announced his retirement in July 2013. > >According that font of all knowledge, Wikipedia, the last release of >plan9 was in early 2015. > >With dozens of dead newsgroups, why this one? There is no hint in the >MVI that there is any interest in this OS, much less in a newsgroup. Would a complete revote be required in order to make this group unmoderated? --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."