Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!jik4.kamens.us!ngp.big-8.org!robomod!not-for-mail
X-NGP-Policy: http://www.big-8.org/~ngp
X-NGP-Info-1: Send submissions to ngp@ngp.big-8.org
X-NGP-Info-2: Send technical complaints to ngp-admin@ngp.big-8.org
X-NGP-Info-3: Send complaints about policy to ngp-board@ngp.big-8.org
X-Comment: Moderators do not necessarily agree or disagree with this article.
X-Robomod: STUMP
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 19:16:58 CST
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 jik4.kamens.us 49UL72B51226900
Authentication-Results: jik4.kamens.us;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=panix.com header.i=@panix.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=panix header.b=k9uRMvyh
Delivered-To: news-groups-proposals@moderators.isc.org
Authentication-Results: mod-relay-1.kamens.us;
dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=panix.com header.i=@panix.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=panix header.b=k9uRMvyh;
dkim-atps=neutral
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=panix.com; s=panix;
t=1730322420; bh=rU6FX+nbsagKc+NF9WJS81YOBQvRVXerp91p7nMpDr0=;
h=To:From:Subject:Date:References;
b=k9uRMvyhNtRP69szUl5c7INp6VFjkZaAxke3wnjJX+HTQpLq7LTl/hdOVK236pssS
wqANv6j8e8xQG25CiQLCgEvTmPDEbAdkSRwlbxYaNXltmCoN8+lm6CLsh3fu0610ar
cUTj4mYcb9WRzOvjvyuB9G39palCzhTrDl5RfwMc=
From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: news.groups.proposals,news.groups
Subject: Re: Moderator Vacancy Investigation: comp.os.plan9
Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000)
Message-ID:
References:
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1
Approved: NGP Approval Key
X-Approval-Mod: tmiller
Lines: 21
X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP news.groups.proposals
iH0EABECAD0WIQSH6so/GGyIEkxgFjWs+RBu6T2F2wUCZyK+ah8cbmdwLWFwcHJv
dmFsLWtleUBuZ3AuYmlnLTgub3JnAAoJEKz5EG7pPYXbAggAoMJzyklMN4acJ98o
O6z1m0CYgkqXAJ0Xp+G79e2mW8coZ7Y5ZhPtIlJpow==
=y7cC
Bytes: 2988
In article , Steve Bonine wrote:
>Big-8 Management Board wrote:
>> This is a formal Moderator Vacancy Investigation (MVI), begun
>> because the moderated newsgroup comp.os.plan9 is not functioning,
>> and has been abandoned by its moderator.
>
>I am sincerely curious.
>
>The moderator announced his retirement in July 2013.
>
>According that font of all knowledge, Wikipedia, the last release of
>plan9 was in early 2015.
>
>With dozens of dead newsgroups, why this one? There is no hint in the
>MVI that there is any interest in this OS, much less in a newsgroup.
Would a complete revote be required in order to make this group
unmoderated?
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."