Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: WM Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 10:18:35 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <0e67005f-120e-4b3b-a4d2-ec4bbc1c5662@att.net> <35794ceb-825a-45df-a55b-0a879cfe80ae@att.net> <40ac3ed2-5648-48c0-ac8f-61bdfd1c1e20@att.net> <71fea361-0069-4a98-89a4-6de2eef62c5e@att.net> <521668acd2ed6184f2f2e36f67fdb1bc3a997524@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 10:18:35 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f6d27a5651dfa207b787fe162a49abcc"; logging-data="342794"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+me1mF/vhVs48w53FMcacR2d9SziXU1H4=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:U9ipLW2ytAak7NooBRHpQFK66sI= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2190 On 09.11.2024 23:01, Moebius wrote: > It confirms only that both sets have the same size, actually aleph_0. True but irrelevant. For covering of all rationals by all naturals there must be the same reality, but that is not. Regards, WM