Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Python (was Re: I did not inhale)
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 08:28:35 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <20240830082835.000008fa@gmail.com>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me>
	<20240815182717.189@kylheku.com>
	<v9npls$1fjus$1@dont-email.me>
	<v9t204$2dofg$1@dont-email.me>
	<va28pi$3dldm$1@dont-email.me>
	<va2ro9$3gd7v$1@dont-email.me>
	<va2vt0$3h3gj$1@dont-email.me>
	<va44rh$3p1l6$1@dont-email.me>
	<va45eq$3pkt9$1@dont-email.me>
	<va4aut$3q4g0$1@dont-email.me>
	<va4fbr$3qvij$1@dont-email.me>
	<va5108$3tmmd$1@dont-email.me>
	<va51ok$3tqr9$1@dont-email.me>
	<va5ec2$3vluh$1@dont-email.me>
	<va6q4g$c1a7$1@dont-email.me>
	<va6rpa$c6bg$1@dont-email.me>
	<va6se9$cb8e$1@dont-email.me>
	<20240826083330.00004760@gmail.com>
	<vaises$2k7o6$2@dont-email.me>
	<20240826155113.000005ba@gmail.com>
	<wwvo75eicla.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
	<vak9k9$2ujrs$1@dont-email.me>
	<valgpu$34s18$1@dont-email.me>
	<vannkg$3ig72$1@dont-email.me>
	<vanrd8$3j0vv$1@dont-email.me>
	<vantnp$3j94i$1@dont-email.me>
	<vapp91$3v4l8$3@dont-email.me>
	<vaqucc$5ioe$1@dont-email.me>
	<vas3tt$eij4$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 17:28:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8d3152d7e4a09de5960c07a932fb7c3b";
	logging-data="575010"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2eh2MElk3Rmjv6sDGfR5esbN8qnRd93M="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LTwtc6tyIA+xhCX19mz4UabgjlI=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 3282

On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 11:38:05 +0200
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote:

> Getting worked up about the way Python blocking works is about as
> productive as getting worked up about the way English language
> spelling works.  There are countless other more useful ways to spend
> your time - and certainly many more enjoyable ways.

Some people actually enjoy arguing on the Internet, y'know.

> When there are a number of smart, experienced and educated people 
> involved in the decisions, "obvious stupidities" are extremely
> unlikely. That's the point of involving multiple people and gathering
> opinions from many in the field.

You may consider it as "unlikely" as you wish, but the fact is that
literal whitespace has been considered Obviously Stupid in the computer-
programming world for so long that it was the subject of a joke re: JCL
in "Real Programmers Don't Use Pascal," published in 1983.

That's not to say that "considered Obviously Stupid" is the same thing
as "objectively wrong" - but if your argument is that all of this is on
equal footing as Just Opinions, discounting decades of established
opinion across the industry in preference to the opinions of the subset
of Python developers & advocates who believe in literal whitespace as
Unambiguously Good rather gives the lie to that.