Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Brown Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Python (was Re: I did not inhale) Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 10:46:55 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <20240826083330.00004760@gmail.com> <20240826155113.000005ba@gmail.com> <87y14hd4bk.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87ikvlcs7i.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <87ttf4bdcx.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <875xrkb2iq.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2024 10:46:55 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="93d7d6b8e3b40fe75b60c4526d162769"; logging-data="3447475"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/I77Bmxsun6oyujNVW+rYZVrz1hLd+4bQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:1fFb5ydVGjiXwM8MIE31oDfGxRU= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 3154 On 03/09/2024 02:09, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 17:06:05 +0200, David Brown wrote: > >> On 31/08/2024 01:49, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> Interesting. Now you are trying to claim that, because you don’t >>> understand what the code does, that makes it somehow “meaningless”? >> >> I covered that in an earlier post. > > Maybe in your mind you thought you did. Nowhere in your comments on this > code did you say so, that I can find. To be accurate, the code in question was not actually /meaningless/ - it was merely pointlessly complex, inefficient and unclear. You wrote: def register_additional_standard(self, **kwargs) : for key in kwargs : if kwargs[key] : if key == "managed_objects" : # .... else : raise TypeError("unrecognized argument keyword “%s”" % key) I changed it in a re-write to: def register_additional_standard(self, managed_objects) : if managed_objects : # .... That change, I think, was lost in the discussions about bizarre formatting practices.