Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Xocyll Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action Subject: Re: Miscellaneous Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 04:20:55 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 30 Message-ID: <37chhjdprrpm86pkjtur8jee40ialogm74@4ax.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:23:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="437c9661281d2c6af37d37058faba04d"; logging-data="2069308"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1957uPF9wkaMOECVY2KXX5f" Cancel-Lock: sha1:1AB98Y8KN51vdoOxVw0eub6xFho= X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.640 Bytes: 2091 Samuel Söderberg looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say: >On 22 Oct 2024 at 12:20:38 CEST, "Xocyll" wrote: > >> This is the group that stayed active, and the others just folded in for >> the most part. > >Were the user bases that segregated? To some extent, and then usenet started dying and they moved off to discussion boards in other locations since among other things they allowed pictures in the content for strategic type games and so on. Those that stayed with usenet aren't particularly finicky, and most were subbed to more than one group anyway and as the numbers dropped away, ..action just became the last.group.standing although .rpg still gets a post once in a while. >> Why would we move from an active group to a dead group? > >From the looks of it, we will not. > >I would still hope for a better fit for the content, but alas. The people actually using the group don't care about fit though, just that this little outpost of usenet is still alive. Xocyll