Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: XhatGPT; How many physicists accept GR? Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 12:54:33 +0800 Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net hyEJXbtCh1G06F5fUENZBg1lvum7MgS3XlTjIe17ZDixKfWn5V Cancel-Lock: sha1:C2qjQaD0TlQPRxiLMP1ua5shPGE= sha256:4GsYJb/lTxG/xO6h9Q1hfWixVbCP7YcMTKEO2yzXBcc= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1353 On 16-Nov-24 9:52 am, rhertz wrote: > ChatGPT entered in crisis here, after I asked HOW MANY (worldwide). > > You realise that it's just a language model based on trawling the Internet? It's not intelligent. I doesn't know anything. It cannot reason. It just composes sentences based on word probabilities derived from the trawling. And guess what? The Internet contains a lot of garbage; garbage that's been fed into the language model. Sylvia.