Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp5-1.free.fr!not-for-mail Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativity Refuted by Elementary Logic From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 10:27:15 +0100 References: <27cf5f58333a92a17fb129caf2cafdd7@www.novabbs.com> <25a0d003c5b33a49f03e0abeecfc94a2@www.novabbs.com> <6735279b$0$12947$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <5a6d4aafdc6bef1e4410c8c306aa09ac@www.novabbs.com> <6735d63c$1$16832$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <42079e861a831c1258353bda7f9b7772@www.novabbs.com> <67367037$0$28073$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Organization: De Ster Mail-Copies-To: nobody User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6) Lines: 22 Message-ID: <673713f3$0$28068$426a74cc@news.free.fr> NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Nov 2024 10:27:15 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58 X-Trace: 1731662835 news-2.free.fr 28068 213.10.137.58:62925 X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net Bytes: 1993 Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote: > On 2024-11-14 21:48:39 +0000, J. J. Lodder said: > > > LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > > > >> Jan: An inconsistent theory does not predict. Relativity is an ideology, > >> so you are ironically projecting your faults onto others. Then you don't > >> know what you are defending because you can't tell me what it predicts. > > > > No quoted text, no reply, > > Not even an indication of which Jan he is referring to. Can he not know > that we have two sane people of that name here? Yes. The LCC entity often picks up some trigger word to go of on a rant of its own, with little or no relation to the input. It would be best if we all stopped replying to such postings. This is just a plainly wrong idea of usenet posting, so abuse, Jan