Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john larkin <JL@gct.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 07:59:07 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <1gdmkjd3fc5i6o179uumhvt3bf3p48sq0j@4ax.com>
References: <vhv3b0$27b8q$2@dont-email.me> <vieu8p$1mopo$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 16:59:08 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29885b941dd035e97fa26ef25062c9e6";
	logging-data="1916033"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+0qLcUzXcE20vIHT/s8rN"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:o4ioEAZ/ytChtL2uHi1PfO3yLZA=
Bytes: 1334

On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 11:51:52 +0000, Clive Arthur
<clive@nowaytoday.co.uk> wrote:

>On 24/11/2024 11:40, Martin Brown wrote:
>
><snipped>
>
>I wonder if there's any mileage in this technique...
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compressed_carbon_dioxide_energy_storage

Propane would be even better. After the pressure recovery, if you
still need power, you could burn it.