Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeroen Belleman Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: 80dB now but still needs improvement at 1KHz Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 10:04:42 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 10:01:02 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1b49e569e141004606ce552c7c28dc4c"; logging-data="2157515"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5hdnpJIgZb5SuYfoKi/q1" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:cwnWzmfnac3j260FDd0/xV41McM= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1676 On 11/6/24 03:39, Edward Rawde wrote: [Snip!] > Now approacing 90dB if you believe the simulation with with this experimental circuit. > You'll want to find something else to do while it simulates. > How to inprove it further? > > Version 4 > [Deleted....] You are chasing ghosts. Simulation doesn't prove anything at this level. Build it and measure it. Jeroen Belleman