Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cursitor Doom Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Datasheet-flation? Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 18:15:49 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: <1r3hwoc.n2yk211k1an2yN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <1r3ix4d.1yypjir8hoviuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <1r3jhb1.ks7h3uj4pk00N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <1r3sfq2.1p1qdnk1d8sh9wN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 19:15:49 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="464dfb1d130dd0b9b60f96112dd59238"; logging-data="2802920"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/W2O3RCzmw0q81EB+MGH3i3wJMMN5wm18=" User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gNF9MIkIh/LgIRwIk0q0K8svrw0= Bytes: 3475 On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 23:35:11 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote: > On 2024-11-29 18:32, Jeroen Belleman wrote: >> On 11/29/24 15:33, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>> On 2024-11-29 15:22, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >>>> Jasen Betts wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2024-11-24, Liz Tuddenham >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Cursitor Doom wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> the English and American "billion" was harmonised many years ago >>>>>>> at one thousand million so there's no confusion. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you give a reference for that?  I haven't found one. >>>>> >>>>> https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04440/ >>>>> SN04440.pdf >>>> >>>> Thank you, that clarifies the situation.  The English Billion still >>>> exists but in 1957 British Ministers were told to use the American >>>> meaning as it was considered "International" by the then Prime >>>> Minister. >>>> >>>> Obviously it cannot be completely international if there are still >>>> countries using it to mean Bi-million nowadays. >>> >>> And languages. Spanish, in Spain at least, a billion is a million >>> million. So one has to be careful when translating. >>> >>> >> All this abundantly demonstrates that we're better off using the metric >> prefixes instead. It'll be next to impossible to make politicians and >> finance accept that though... > > Right! > > Or notations like 5*10^9 or 5E9 (calculators did this. Do they still > do? 5E9 is very simple) When you deal with RF it's essential to have a scientific calculator that can handle exponents like that. I continue to be amazed at the computing power they're capable of for next to no money. In real terms they're a fraction of the price they were when they first became available. The first ever scientific calculator I ever had was an HP one. A friend had the Sinclair one. Another had a Bowmar (they went bust around 1975 IIRC). They were a quantum leap over what we used beforehand.