Path: ...!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 00:43:50 +0000 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity X-Mozilla-News-Host: snews://giganews.com:443 From: Ross Finlayson Subject: Relativity theory from other angles Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:44:11 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <-uCcnXHlifVbnY76nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 36 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-17SKWEy0DlB4wAgFUMlhqrj7wPI5WlaRTkuO1d5IpfFDAKT14ZOHANQKtId0uk2xFRUNW15P5qFYrhc!YLYq2QpOC6WIkB1oX0zxu2prYh0ZZzDwxB2RX0C0nNnHFi4hdKw2KUNIDEM5HpQ0fxFmmWaG7Nb3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2142 Hey, what if you derive light speed from the mass-energy equivalency instead of the other way around? Then, with that and a vanishing yet non-zero gradient the cosmological constant, then relativity the theory with the L-principle can be framed as sort of deriving in reverse the light speed from the mass/energy equivalency according to the "spacial" and "spatial", Einstein's terms for the space for SR and space for GR, thusly that GR is first then SR is derived from it and also the L-principle or light's constancy of speed, is also derived as an invariant according to the space terms, why that instead of "K.E." or e = mc^2 is the c = root(e/m). Then also that makes for fitting electron physics right next to that with e/m the electron's charge to mass ratio. About absolutes and what's relative and Einstein's usual "this Einstein's relativity is a very simplest negative statement that velocity is relative" has, ..., there are others. There's only one absolute, though, ....