Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Is there a way in Fortran to designate an integer value as integer*8 ? Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 22:32:06 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: <7XpPO.33280$MoU3.15533@fx36.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:32:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8e07f34fd508234a93a0d7f7570ee3ce"; logging-data="1979476"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Fw9eSz14kIS6AuojDku1Z" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/YAhbZcEhE39XQ55j+BAlYFrOj4= Bytes: 1672 On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 02:43:47 -0600, Louis Krupp wrote: > I never would > have guessed that 47 years later, FORTRAN would be Fortran and ALGOL > would be mostly forgotten.) What irks me most is the prevalence of “=” over “:=” for assignment. But, looking at language specs for Fortran-90 and later, would you still say “FORTRAN is Fortran”?