Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on Texting
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 19:28:25 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 60
Message-ID: <qqu6lj97e9ao80750gi6ajrjv1dcct7p9r@4ax.com>
References: <vigakc$21500$1@dont-email.me> <pr2qkj1aqnm291jk8ikkgq1ah7gp6pugi9@4ax.com> <viqhl5$139l2$1@dont-email.me> <sar1ljdekeh3nqqsucjdimj1675aln1a83@4ax.com> <visjbn$1mraa$2@dont-email.me> <17d4ljd6ajlkjlbf2r86cflqfbjljjoup1@4ax.com> <vitotm$23fab$1@dont-email.me> <0hr4ljhkatgq9pnje0venf0ckf2k5mpv94@4ax.com> <vituve$24o7j$1@dont-email.me> <viur39$2b258$1@dont-email.me> <7a26ljtptkdkdkk7g7l0gdcahbinhilbk3@4ax.com> <vivqt4$2g19u$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 01:28:26 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="eafa9bdc89461bdfed09d83787ef66a6";
	logging-data="2810635"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PGExj45kEKmWK3uQQYMMnQ6C+TQY1r0c="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:82BSz1RGsvu2Jf6LwMOqMUeCrX4=
OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 3633

-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>On 12/6/24 9:28 AM, Joel wrote:
>> -hh wrote:
>>> On 12/5/24 11:35 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2024-12-05 19:32, Joel wrote:
>>>>> -hh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Make sure to also include an NVMe benched on the open slot that's on the
>>>>>> slower PCIe 3 bus that you've been saying is your 'future expansion'.
>>>>>
>>>>> You act as though PCI-e 3 isn't great already.
>>>>
>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunderbolt_(interface)>
>>>
>>> Joel's acting as though Thunderbolt 3 wasn't great already:
>>>
>>> * bandwidth of a PCIe 3.0 x4 is 4 gigabytes per second = 4 GB/.
>>>
>>> * Thunderbolt 3's bandwidth is 4000 MB/s = 5 GB/s.
>>>
>>> And 2024 Macs have TB5, which means 10 GB/sec bandwidth, enabling
>>> an external SSD to perform like a 2TB internal Apple OEM SSD from
>>> a 2020 vintage Mac Studio.
>> 
>> OK, none of that makes what I have any slower.
>
>Nah, it shows where your claim that USB is slow is factually incorrect.
>
>So much for your standards for "high end" which just aren't really...
>
>Plus it shows that stuff just gets labelled by you as 'overpriced' is 
>also higher performance gear than your self-proclaimed "high end" stuff.
>
>Per the old adage of "Speed cost money. How fast can you afford to go?", 
>its evident that you're deriding that which you want, but won't afford.
>
>...and still waiting on you to post benchmarks, too... /s


I haven't addressed the external storage's speed, but immediate access
of internal drives is a higher grade or level.

That being said, Win11 and 10 did install pretty painlessly, on my
system.  Just one becomes aware that Linux will trump anything

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.