Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Angle Units For Trig Functions Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 04:47:06 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 06:47:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f4e50c47efa3e669267791fe76a6c176"; logging-data="2633976"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fDhEXyFhCDke3xl7Myoq5" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:GBCaBveQp5cfOSF/V6rs/NgOyvg= Bytes: 1779 On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 02:17:15 -0000 (UTC), Steven G. Kargl wrote: > One of these values is wrong. Only if you assume the input numbers were somehow “exact” or “perfect” to begin with. There’s an old principle in computing: “Garbage In, Garbage Out”. > You seem to be missing that argument reduction for sind(x) > is much easier than argument reduction for sin(x). But that only worked for one angle, and for nothing else.