Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jim Jackson Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer Subject: Re: Faking a TTY on a pipe/socketpair Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 22:40:30 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 23:40:30 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f692c707b6c9054ea3380615f7664cf0"; logging-data="1844371"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19sBb/oQaDZ97rzDfrBmBpXJuMmSF1j4zY=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:rhpwdBx792y3U8pcOCPiuUqiIFc= Bytes: 2165 On 2024-12-11, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:33:29 -0000 (UTC), Muttley wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 20:55:05 -0000 (UTC) >> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wibbled: >>> >>> One thing lacking from sysvinit is, while it can start a service, it >>> cannot ensure the service was started properly, and it cannot perform >>> reliable service shutdown. So the job of service management was really >>> only half-done. >> >> It doesn't need to , it can just spawn off a script or some other >> program which does that which is entirely inline with the unix >> philosophy. > > Which is where the trouble starts. > >> Something Poettering never understood. > > Poettering understands that services don???t just to be started, they also > need to be managed and shut down cleanly. My God, how did we all manage running services before systemd came along?