Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 06:58:47 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <56dj2l-c8492.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <vivjmk$1m4s8$1@dont-email.me> <a6e2eb95631b7c655d8f67ceecad9d0b@www.novabbs.com> <vj4qho$3udk0$1@dont-email.me> <1de794cabbe5bd82e10b0c6099b17a40@www.novabbs.com> <ek5i2l-quk72.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <af9ac89c45a9a9eb76dce999536cf901@www.novabbs.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:01:08 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2c946b056f8276f31cc75b5ba9aa8fe8";
	logging-data="489977"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193C8tjF/JIUE/qVcNLnRVo"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-126-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rjW4ZKBo5MiKTlcIHUId30gfXIM=
Bytes: 3689

bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 3:43:44 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:03:20 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 12/6/24 19:12, Bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>> Lousy research skills by Einsteinians on display!
>>>>
>>>> For some reason, you edited out everything I said, so it is not on
>>>> display.  Maybe you don't really want it to be on display, hmm?
>>>
>>> It is not necessary to repost what has already been posted. Anyone can
>>> follow a thread to see what was written earlier.
>>>>
>>>>> True that Arindam's 2013 conference paper was rejected by Europeans but
>>>>> was accepted by the Chinese, Koreans and the Japanese reviewers. In 2016
>>>>> Arindam did realise the experiment he had described in the 2013 paper.
>>>>> However the faculty at RMIT stabbed him in the back. They denied that
>>>>> Arindam had made a working model of a new design rail gun, and failed
>>>>> Arindam at his final PhD viva. Arindam then continued entirely on his
>>>>> own and in 2017 posted online a full set of YouTube videos with complete
>>>>> details. In later years he made more powerful guns and developed the new
>>>>> theory, got more powerful capacitors to show inertia violation very
>>>>> clearly. This proving his new physics started back in 1998.
>>>>
>>>> I was responding to the claim that rail guns don't recoil.
>>>
>>> That is not entirely correct. The claim is that the electromagnetic
>>> force accelerating the armature - under certain conditions - does NOT
>>> have an equal and opposite reaction. Now mechanical force is needed to
>>> launch the projectile upon the rails. That force has a reaction of
>>> course. The recoil seen on videos is the reaction from the mechanical
>>> component.
>>
>> There is no mechanical force in a railgun, all the force is
>> electromagnetic, crackpot.
> 
> Not so, penisnono Penisnino. If you just put 1000000 amps through a
> static bullet it will just weld, melt. You have to give it an initial
> velocity through mechanical or chemical or magnetic means, and all those
> have the smallish recoil one can see in practical rail guns, including
> Arindam's.

Nonsense.

While there are hybrid railguns that use a plasma arc to fire
non-conducting projectiles, a pure railgun has a conducting projectile
and two or more conducting rails and ALL motion is due to electromagnetics,
crackpot.

It appears you have no clue how a railgun actually works, crackpot.

<snip remaining utter nonsense>