Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Named pipes vs. Unix sockets Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 20:52:17 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 21:52:17 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d0640d653b3828f8761808e02c741927"; logging-data="1412007"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+p5cWB79aAWaaEawE3lKLd" User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:hEIg2jlKTiSjPtR/6x1aYwoal2k= Bytes: 1819 On Fri, 22 Nov 2024 10:00:31 -0500, Phillip Frabott wrote: > At the moment we have to do 4.6GB per 0.5sec to keep up, and > 7GB per 0.5sec to stay ahead. We've done everything we can to squeeze > out as much performance from pipes as we could but there just isn't much > we can do anymore. Sounds like a job for a shared memory section.