Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@REMOVEtroutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: writing a module file in gfortran 14
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 05:44:56 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <vj0nco$2t5a0$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vio2n4$d19a$1@dont-email.me> <viqd1m$12u2e$1@dont-email.me>
	<viqh24$13p8p$2@dont-email.me> <viqsp8$16lin$1@dont-email.me>
	<vir0jo$17csf$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 06:44:57 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="392ff5fb24fcdde57378421525b4cde3";
	logging-data="3052864"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18jTV/jTlNffDdS3IdhqMwI"
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:q3D64XNNInWrk4XDsiQdbGkT/Ms=
Bytes: 1626

On Thu, 05 Dec 2024 01:45:28 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 18:40:08 -0600, Gary Scott wrote:
> 
>> I think the design is correct in requiring the implicit none to be
>> repeated.
> 
> The sooner that implicit “IMPLICIT NONE” is added to the standard, the 
> better, I think.

IMPLICIT NONE is a part of the Fortran standard.  It's been
a part for a very long time.  Perhaps, you meant that IMPLICIT
NONE should be the default behavior.  That will never happen.

-- 
steve