Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas Koenig Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: Upcoming gfortran 15 will contain unsigned numbers Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 08:04:06 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: Injection-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2024 09:04:06 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="27feec26f7d81c9af3089940b6efdfb3"; logging-data="1720378"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+xN+Dde65k9pbS3bG0SUWAlmxXXKZm6NQ=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:gX8L0F3G5pofkiHB9PPe4BTyHdU= Bytes: 2039 Lynn McGuire schrieb: > On 11/9/2024 5:57 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote: >> Lynn McGuire schrieb: >>> On 10/15/2024 5:35 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>>> On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 15:26:42 -0500, Lynn McGuire wrote: >>>> >>>>> Any plans to support UTF16 or UTF8 in gfortran ? >>>> >>>> No UTF-16, please! >>>> >>>> That was just a horrible backward-compatibility hack for the sake of those >>>> platforms (*cough* Java, Windows NT *cough*) that embraced Unicode as >>>> their native encoding just a little too soon. >>> >>> Aren't all of the Unix and Linux boxen either UTF-16 or UTF-32 ? >> >> Most certainly not: >> >> $ echo $LANG >> de_DE.UTF-8 >> >> Haven't seen anything but UTF-8 in a long time. > > Come over here to Windows. I should have qualified that with "on Linux". > UTF-16 is the name of the game. It is a > total pain. I can well believe that. At least Fortran has standard methods of using UTF-8.