Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!epsilon3.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jay E. Morris" Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: OT: Relevant Doonesbury strip from 1981 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:13:25 -0600 Organization: very little if any Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <49de8a3617f041b988e84c5a12ca817b@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 23:13:27 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: epsilon3.eternal-september.org; posting-host="807e52f5ae560b5ae461926e101d6fb0"; logging-data="2541588"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+84vboC2bv8ynVE4gWAwAIKFWZGDMZfTY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ro/UZTntjvk3gzAOnk1NxhQeh2A= Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 241113-6, 11/13/2024), Outbound message In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 2001 On 11/13/2024 10:20 AM, Paul S Person wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 18:11:54 +0000, Lenona > wrote: > >> (I'm not sure why I bothered saying "OT" when so many other comic strips >> get mentioned here!) >> >> https://www.gocomics.com/doonesbury/1981/09/20 >> >> You can enlarge it. > It's actually easier to read when not enlarged. Apparently, it isn't > the sort of image that enlarges well. That's always a problem with the Doonesbury comics and especially so with the Sundays. At normal size the type is often too small for me, even on my 17" screen, and when blown up it just becomes a smudge. There's a small sweet spot for me where I can just read it.