Path: ...!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 20:10:47 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <cc282ee24e9d14c44b6da1d78bb2c3b83b54f4d0@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vjufr6$29khr$3@dont-email.me>
	<4bf8a77e-4b2a-471f-9075-0b063098153f@att.net>
	<vjv6uv$2dra0$1@dont-email.me>
	<31180d7e-1c2b-4e2b-b8d6-e3e62f05da43@att.net>
	<vk1brk$2srss$7@dont-email.me>
	<bb80c6c5-04c0-4e2d-bb21-ac51aab9e252@att.net>
	<vk23m7$31l8v$1@dont-email.me>
	<bce1b27d-170c-4385-8938-36805c983c49@att.net> <vk693m$f52$2@dont-email.me>
	<a17eb8b6-7d11-4c59-b98c-b4d5de8358ca@att.net> <vk7dmb$7mh2$2@dont-email.me>
	<b72490c1-e61a-4c23-a3a5-f624b2c084e4@att.net> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me>
	<bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net>
	<vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
	<c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net>
	<n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
	<45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
	<3d2fe306aa299bc78e94c14dadd21645d8db9829@i2pn2.org>
	<vkr8sq$t59a$2@dont-email.me>
	<d4669f26483b01c8a43dfd3ac4b61ab4a42bf551@i2pn2.org>
	<vksikk$17fjt$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 20:10:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1170789"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2579
Lines: 18

Am Sun, 29 Dec 2024 23:31:46 +0100 schrieb WM:
> On 29.12.2024 22:27, joes wrote:
>> Am Sun, 29 Dec 2024 11:39:22 +0100 schrieb WM:
> 
>>> A relative size is very useful in order to correct the fantasy claim
>>> that the union of all FISONs covers the infinite gap between all
>>> FISONs and ω.
>> There is no gap.
> If all FISONs are finite and followed by infinite endsegments, then
> there is an infinite gap.
Nope. Infinity is just that far away - not finite.

> My theorem: Every union of FISONs which stay below a certain threshold
> stays below that threshold.
Groundbreaking.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.