Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 09:59:20 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <ea2dd74b1b7ed4f1b4559246c4d82b816c8f1356@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vqagb7$2ivcn$3@dont-email.me>
	<vqakhi$2jief$3@dont-email.me> <vqalvr$2ivcn$5@dont-email.me>
	<vqaq2s$2lgq7$2@dont-email.me> <vqasm4$2lue4$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqb43k$2mueq$1@dont-email.me> <vqb4ub$2lue4$3@dont-email.me>
	<vqb683$2mueq$2@dont-email.me> <vqbp05$2td95$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqcvlu$34c3r$3@dont-email.me> <vqecht$3epcf$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqf2lh$3j68u$5@dont-email.me> <vqf6mm$3j47v$4@dont-email.me>
	<vqg7ng$3qol2$3@dont-email.me> <vqh07g$26ac$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqhio1$5r7r$1@dont-email.me> <vqhm1s$6fo8$2@dont-email.me>
	<vqih45$bcso$1@dont-email.me> <vqii32$bcd0$3@dont-email.me>
	<vqijht$bcso$3@dont-email.me> <vqik16$bcd0$5@dont-email.me>
	<vqine6$cton$1@dont-email.me> <vqiovv$d4j1$2@dont-email.me>
	<vqiqk0$dc6s$2@dont-email.me> <vqirn6$dje3$1@dont-email.me>
	<vqiug9$duqq$1@dont-email.me> <vqiur3$dje3$3@dont-email.me>
	<vqj2ab$dje3$8@dont-email.me> <vqj2pn$ef0h$7@dont-email.me>
	<vqj342$dje3$10@dont-email.me> <vqj3bc$ef0h$9@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 09:59:20 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3558681"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2668
Lines: 20

Am Sat, 08 Mar 2025 21:53:16 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 3/8/2025 9:49 PM, dbush wrote:
>> On 3/8/2025 10:43 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/8/2025 9:35 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Your copy-paste answer to multiple threads indicates you have no real
>>>> rebuttal for what others have said.
>>>>
>>> *This is all you get from me until this point is fully addressed*
>>>   <copy-paste response>
>>>
>> In other words, you have no rebuttal.
> 
> *This is all you get from me until this point is fully addressed*
> *UNTIL YOU FULLY UNDERSTAND THIS YOU CAN'T POSSIBLY UNDERSTAND* *THE
> NEXT STEP THAT ADDRESSES ALL OF THE OTHER ISSUES*
What is the next step?

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.