Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: education Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:13:08 -0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: References: <67b21894$14$17$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <87a59t5sw0.fsf@example.com> Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 19:13:08 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80"; logging-data="7097"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) Bytes: 1688 Lines: 18 In article , Stefan Ram wrote: >Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> wrote or quoted: >>Calculus is for engineers and physicists, mathematicians want to be >>doing things that are not Solved Problems. > > The basics of calculus were hammered out ages ago, but it's still > a big deal for pushing the envelope in pure and applied math. > > These days, researchers often mash up calculus with other fields. > Take the I-functions of Calabi-Yau manifolds, for instance. > There, they're throwing calculus together with differential > equations and algebra to get a handle on geometric structures. > These matter for string theory, but still are mathematics. One should be careful not to conflate calculus with analysis. - Dan C.