Path: ...!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 03:15:10 +0000
Subject: Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^2
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <eN6cnRy1afc0GuL7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <KDKdnarg5JDvFOL7nZ2dnZfqnPiWy52d@giganews.com>
 <IJSdnZK-R6fFgx37nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 20:15:15 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <IJSdnZK-R6fFgx37nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <-6ydnfkz5pGjNhH7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 99
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-VavLcwlgTh29OKuhM6JaMH5v7GE38+ia6dDc/N//4IUvSgJavBWM3BjvodFAEcfge2b6EzS8deoYWWz!UmPkLHETZSYIitGbcxD5689SpnFaIpPFx8deab01vPq6pGI+ZSFn0XegfWWvuE4TyO82TznUGx1m!tA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 5496

On 06/29/2024 07:46 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 06/28/2024 09:11 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 06/28/2024 09:04 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>> In "Out of My Later Years", Einstein's introduces another
>>> mass-energy equivalence formula after kinetic terms.
>>>
>>> So if it's sort of Einstein's second-most famous formula,
>>> why hasn't anybody heard of it?
>>>
>>> m'/m = e/c^2
>>>
>>> It introduces that the terms in the rotational, make
>>> for that mass-energy equivalence only sits in the
>>> rotational setting, among all the other usual terms.
>>>
>>> It's introduced in a brief note near the end of
>>> the material on science in Einstein's "Out of My
>>> Later Years".
>>>
>>> It really makes for a sort of way to make it so
>>> that the space-contraction results real while
>>> also that the linear is rather Galilean, while
>>> still fulfilling all the usual derivations, if
>>> not necessarily the rhetoric or intuitions,
>>> yet very intuitionistically while all formally.
>>>
>>>
>>> It's pretty great I wonder why it's not well-known.
>>>
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_factor
>>
>>
>
> These ideas in "Lorentz factor" in accommodating what are
> the "fictitious forces", which are real, and making for
> why there is boost addition with regards to addition
> formulae in what are continuous milieux, often harkens
> to the "Larmor forces" and "Larmor formula", "Lorentz-Larmor".
>
>
> Then, "Lorentz factor" also reflects that in the "Lorentz
> transformations", that it results about differential analysis
> being about constants vis-a-vis implicits, of course about
> metrics and norms of fields and gauges, helping explain why
> Einstein's theory by itself, and Feynman's theories themselves,
> have the _forms_ of the coordinate-free according to tensors,
> or the quantum amplitudes according to discretization, yet
> as well these have continuous _forms_, that "Lorentz factor"
> has all the components of "Lorentz transform" broken out
> as variously projective, for various purposes, here then
> mostly for "space-contraction" and "FitzGerald", then that
> FitzGerald, Larmor, Heaviside, and Faraday, are close to Maxwell.
>
> Einstein: in his "Out of My Later Years", which is great,
> has that he _does_ make for that SR is local, then that
> GR being fundamental thusly, then that m'/m = e/c^2,
> is a quite _profound_ connection of the objects of
> Einstein's theory, both equipping the rotational setting
> for mass-energy equivalency, and, detaching it from the
> Galilean.
>
> So, Einstein's second mass-energy equivalency relation,
> and the relation to Einstein's bridges about the centrally
> symmetrical, with how he left his board, are key concepts
> connecting the classical and the superclassical,
> and showing how mathematically it's a thing.
>
>



Moment and Motion: template-theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kexL9IfmwY

Geometry and motion, Newton's laws, Newton's law(s),
the geodetic survey, Zeno's arguments and time,
acceleration and derivatives of displacement
with respect to time, the infinitely-differentiable,
physical theories, physical theory, pseudomomentum,
law(s) of large numbers, Cantor space(s), undecide-ability
of various conjectures in number theory, the quasi-invariant
and pseudo-differential, constructivism, continuous domain(s),
logic and modern logic, networks and graphs, quasi-modal logic,
inference rules, tautologies, dynamics, template-theory, Huntington
postulates and universals and complementary duals, Cavailles, material
science in microgravity, Marangoni convection, Haar integral, a book of
Confucius, Graustein's higher geometry, pencils and points at infinity,
perspective and projective, normed rings, norms and metrics or metrics
and norms, attributes of algebra, theorems of Tauberian type, ring
boundary, algebra and its usual model arithmetic, function theory,
operator calculus and operator calculus, initial and final and
continuous topologies, swath integral, theory together.



https://reviews.ophen.org/2021/10/26/jean-cavailles-on-the-logic-and-theory-of-science/