Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<-EWmjGKONq4RBMKOeQiHbeH8LXk@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <-EWmjGKONq4RBMKOeQiHbeH8LXk@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Does the number of nines =?UTF-8?Q?increase=3F?= References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <59961718-bd36-46df-801a-4f977fcc05cf@att.net> <v5hnrl$29b21$3@dont-email.me> <a21eede6-2b9f-44f0-8732-32bd92700dfb@att.net> <eZZGYbe53s6yBDBqGuTMM_Z1y7A@jntp> <v5lspm$1bs52$2@i2pn2.org> <HlcnRXFQ42qMfnJgEw40TN7tXjI@jntp> <v640ke$297u9$2@dont-email.me> <JZpqdwwOwjdh5WP3Om6XikdFFoE@jntp> <b5b447c6d11dfdb91d814fc51296a21b660a0bce@i2pn2.org> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: t0tn8XjxJtzyWPIZxbH1FF3sPR0 JNTP-ThreadID: 0JbXgoRqYUfKvvWhEBWZVJgnda4 JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=-EWmjGKONq4RBMKOeQiHbeH8LXk@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Thu, 04 Jul 24 14:07:13 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="25d5a506365fc8262443ce1bd287e5d0233c1bef"; logging-data="2024-07-04T14:07:13Z/8931971"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 2260 Lines: 19 Le 04/07/2024 à 13:00, joes a écrit : > Am Wed, 03 Jul 2024 20:05:48 +0000 schrieb WM: > >>> so dass n < m < ω gilt. >> For every visible natural number this is true. > There is no such thing as „visibility”. There is invisibility: For all visible/choosable n: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo. > >> Like ∀x > 0: NUF(x) = ℵo is true. But this truth proves the existence of >> dark numbers, because between every such x and 0 there must lie ℵo unit >> fractions and ℵo finite distances between them. > Why? That distance can be divided infinitely. But the first unit fraction already is an x > 0. Regards, WM