| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<-NGdnauPY7t0dh76nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:20:57 +0000 Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary) Newsgroups: sci.math References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vlc68u$k8so$1@dont-email.me> <vldpj7$vlah$7@dont-email.me> <a8b010b748782966268688a38b58fe1a9b4cc087@i2pn2.org> <vlei6e$14nve$1@dont-email.me> <66868399-5c4b-4816-9a0c-369aaa824553@att.net> <vlir7p$24c51$1@dont-email.me> <417ff6da-86ee-4b3a-b07a-9c6a8eb31368@att.net> <vllfof$2n0uj$2@dont-email.me> <07258ab9-eee1-4aae-902a-ba39247d5942@att.net> <vlmst2$2vjr0$3@dont-email.me> <1ebbc233d6bab7878b69cae3eda48c7bbfd07f88@i2pn2.org> <vlo5f4$39hil$2@dont-email.me> <4c89380adaad983f24d5d6a75842aaabbd1adced@i2pn2.org> <vloule$3eqsr$1@dont-email.me> <ffffed23878945243684de7f2aa9aaaf29564508@i2pn2.org> <vlrej9$2m5k$1@dont-email.me> <d6ed4797-65e8-4004-853c-f07a37af0c11@att.net> <vls4j6$7v2k$3@dont-email.me> <adef9ec5c327614374fdc3c3cc55d7a753e28a36@i2pn2.org> <vltfo8$heoh$5@dont-email.me> <7fc40cc2dbd42016a62aa0374d545e9e787a7da3@i2pn2.org> <vltu35$lav6$1@dont-email.me> <vm0a73$14qpl$1@dont-email.me> <vm0ar4$14ugc$1@dont-email.me> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 08:20:56 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <vm0ar4$14ugc$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <-NGdnauPY7t0dh76nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 31 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-KzfcCcZjX/g0d3qlmP9qRR9loN1AAxqIMUEY/AAPz27I/9cNAM03F1GghYoQ67k9MQcTNbucfzVol8a!aYjqpKUJq/TDXtfxys842lLRgp5IRFUj7TYvWPULo9e54uqoO8v4uLpx8zG3+C4gnCHX4lHMtZQ= X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 On 01/12/2025 03:59 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: > WM submitted this idea : >> On 11.01.2025 15:09, FromTheRafters wrote: >>> joes laid this down on his screen : >>>> Am Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:04:56 +0100 schrieb WM: >> >>>>> If Cantor has constructed a sequence containing all even numbers of >>>>> the >>>>> original set ℕ, then the doubled even numbers are missing. >>>> What? Doubled even numbers are also even numbers. >>> >>> He's a hopeless case. >> >> Yes, you cannot hope ever to understand the difference between >> potential and actual infinity. > > I've yet to see any useful application of the notion of potential > infinity. IMO it was created to appease the philosophers and later > rejected as useless by modern mathematicians. > >> In actual infinity all numbers are present. No one is missing, >> according to Cantor. None can be added. >> If you multiply every number by 2, then larger even numbers than all >> hitherto present even numbers are created because the number of >> numbers remains constant but the odd numbers disappear. > > Wrong, the numbers are not 'created' as they already existed. Ah, a true mathematical platonism, ....