Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <-TlqoXvHYNmOxcLTfCR8QRNL0_g@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Incorrect mathematical integration
References: <EKV4LWfwyF4mvRIpW8X1iiirzQk@jntp> <v7ri3a$1rs1b$1@dont-email.me> <ftN6UmDr7W62aPoOQpYysEUFAh8@jntp>
 <v7rp5h$1t5kp$1@dont-email.me> <BQ5j0PykzttrIMqyw16zXh2VQVU@jntp> <v7u8d2$2dodj$1@dont-email.me>
 <WxEQQfYMZ9Ktt8wAuyCpiQ5L8Tg@jntp> <v807nm$2rgp7$1@dont-email.me> <Y1zx7pfoPsbKo0KHuPJBLUEcaI0@jntp>
 <v80usp$2vjv9$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: dtw-yrfl7MxHf6uo4hj_aPjLZDs
JNTP-ThreadID: Ptg0buW51I-Cbbzx-mVW15r6pQg
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=-TlqoXvHYNmOxcLTfCR8QRNL0_g@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 24 20:29:37 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-26T20:29:37Z/8965142"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 3150
Lines: 32

Le 26/07/2024 à 21:54, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
> Den 26.07.2024 18:14, skrev Richard Hachel:

> How do you think that the proton can have two different speeds
> in the laboratory frame?
> 
> Of course it can't in the real world.

We must say simple things, and we must say true things.
It is very difficult in special relativity because of the frequent 
conceptual errors. Sometimes when I read certain things here or elsewhere, 
I have the impression that everything is sinking into horror.
We must be careful about the confusion of words.
You say, a body can only have one speed, and you seem to think that I am 
an idiot.
But no, I am not an idiot, and it is precisely because of morons like 
Python that I can pass for an idiot.
Do you think that I am so stupid to say that a moving body can have two 
different speeds at the same time?
When I say that a body can have, in the same frame of reference, many 
different speeds, that is OBVIOUSLY not what I am talking about.
Let us assume a speed Vo=0.8c.
It is quite obvious that I cannot have at the same time, at the risk of 
being absurd, I who claim to describe the most beautiful, the simplest and 
the most logical theory, a life that is Vo=0.8/c, Vo=0.9c, Vo=0.5c and 
Vo=0.999c.
It would be absurd, and it would be dishonest to make me say what I did 
not say.
Now, I can still write Vo=0.8c, Vr=(4/3)c, Vapp'=0.4444c and Vapp"=4c.
You just have to understand what I write, why I write it, and validate it 
without spitting on it.

R.H.