Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (infinitary)
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 07:54:51 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <001ce71635edd59bb004413b2f16e8c5b95549be@i2pn2.org>
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vdto2k$1jte$1@news.muc.de>
 <vdu4mt$18h8h$1@dont-email.me> <vdu874$271t$2@news.muc.de>
 <vdua6f$18vqi$2@dont-email.me> <vdubg3$24me$1@news.muc.de>
 <4bc3b086-247a-4547-89cc-1d47f502659d@tha.de> <ve0n4i$1vps$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve10qb$1p7ge$1@dont-email.me> <ve117p$vob$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve315q$24f8f$3@dont-email.me> <ve46vu$324$2@news.muc.de>
 <ve5u2i$2jobg$4@dont-email.me> <ve6329$19d5$1@news.muc.de>
 <ve64kl$2m0nm$4@dont-email.me> <ve66f3$19d5$2@news.muc.de>
 <ve683o$6c2o$1@solani.org> <09d9f0df-b1bb-42a7-af9b-890bfbcfc581@att.net>
 <b0fa9a1c-8375-4523-a15e-65789688660e@tha.de>
 <3f63bc22-83b2-4d56-9837-849551170c77@att.net>
 <50ac7044-f8c1-47d9-947f-9fa6044e1848@tha.de>
 <68b8be64-7fe8-47e7-a991-7adf14713af5@att.net> <vejmkm$e069$1@solani.org>
 <eb21591a-a60a-4baf-bdbd-afef2a69c230@att.net> <vejte9$e3ds$1@solani.org>
 <53460f91-4542-4a92-bc4b-833c2ad61e52@att.net> <ventec$255vi$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 11:54:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2285107"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <ventec$255vi$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2766
Lines: 22

On 10/16/24 4:27 AM, WM wrote:
> On 15.10.2024 02:00, Jim Burns wrote:
> 
>> So, what is that perfectly reasonable explanation?
> 
> There is a general rule not open to further discussion:
> When doubling natural numbers we obtain natural numbers which have not 
> been doubled.
> In potential infinity we obtain more even natural numbers than have been 
> doubled.
> In actual infinity we double ℕ and obtain neither ℕ or a subset of ℕ.
> 
> Regards, WM

But that isn't actually a general rule, so you are just admitting that 
you aren't talking about the same Natural Numbers that everyone else is 
talking about, but some bastadization that is just fininte.

NO natural number when doubled results in a value that wasn't a natural 
number all the time.

Your problem is that your "Acutal Infinity" isn't actually Infinity, and 
like isn't actually "actually".