Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<014fc86287c38edf8f0a861a53712e020eab003e@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 18:52:32 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <014fc86287c38edf8f0a861a53712e020eab003e@i2pn2.org> References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vi6uc3$3v0dn$4@dont-email.me> <b2d7ee1f-33ab-44b6-ac90-558ac2f768a7@att.net> <vi7tnf$4oqa$1@dont-email.me> <23311c1a-1487-4ee4-a822-cd965bd024a0@att.net> <e9eb6455-ed0e-43f6-9a53-61aa3757d22d@tha.de> <71758f338eb239b7419418f49dfd8177c59d778b@i2pn2.org> <via83s$jk72$2@dont-email.me> <viag8h$lvep$1@dont-email.me> <viaj9q$l91n$1@dont-email.me> <vibvfo$10t7o$1@dont-email.me> <vic6m9$11mrq$4@dont-email.me> <vicbp2$1316h$1@dont-email.me> <vid4ts$1777k$2@dont-email.me> <vidcv3$18pdu$1@dont-email.me> <bdbc0e3d-1db2-4d6a-9f71-368d36d96b40@tha.de> <vier32$1madr$1@dont-email.me> <vierv5$1l1ot$2@dont-email.me> <viiqfd$2qq41$5@dont-email.me> <vik73d$3a9jm$1@dont-email.me> <vikg6c$3c4tu$1@dont-email.me> <9bcc128b-dea8-4397-9963-45c93d1c14c7@att.net> <vimvgd$3vv5r$9@dont-email.me> <50c82b03-8aa1-492c-9af3-4cf2673d6516@att.net> <vip5mo$p0da$1@dont-email.me> <6aa872f4a68fc2f9c14fbe61f446ca0fa00f1745@i2pn2.org> <viq31c$uvp8$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 18:52:32 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1277282"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2380 Lines: 13 Am Wed, 04 Dec 2024 18:20:45 +0100 schrieb WM: > On 04.12.2024 16:33, joes wrote: >> Am Wed, 04 Dec 2024 10:00:08 +0100 schrieb WM: > >>> A* set of non-empty endsegments has a non-empty intersection. The >>> reason is inclusion-monotony. >> *finite > No. Why should the intersection of endsegments get empty before the > endsegments? What makes you think that? -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.