Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Arindam Banerjee's peer-reviewed 2013 paper
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 05:12:17 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <02357ded9474b1ee244444a33c21b46e@www.novabbs.com>
References: <vivjmk$1m4s8$1@dont-email.me> <a6e2eb95631b7c655d8f67ceecad9d0b@www.novabbs.com> <vj4qho$3udk0$1@dont-email.me> <1de794cabbe5bd82e10b0c6099b17a40@www.novabbs.com> <ek5i2l-quk72.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <af9ac89c45a9a9eb76dce999536cf901@www.novabbs.com> <56dj2l-c8492.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2131286"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$9oaFBCcOcIxbqanY/KnWDeY12sCF05A7xnXxrll.0PHgxoO46Enoa
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 4254
Lines: 69

On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 14:58:47 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 3:43:44 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 19:03:20 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/6/24 19:12, Bertietaylor wrote:
>>>>>> Lousy research skills by Einsteinians on display!
>>>>>
>>>>> For some reason, you edited out everything I said, so it is not on
>>>>> display.  Maybe you don't really want it to be on display, hmm?
>>>>
>>>> It is not necessary to repost what has already been posted. Anyone can
>>>> follow a thread to see what was written earlier.
>>>>>
>>>>>> True that Arindam's 2013 conference paper was rejected by Europeans but
>>>>>> was accepted by the Chinese, Koreans and the Japanese reviewers. In 2016
>>>>>> Arindam did realise the experiment he had described in the 2013 paper.
>>>>>> However the faculty at RMIT stabbed him in the back. They denied that
>>>>>> Arindam had made a working model of a new design rail gun, and failed
>>>>>> Arindam at his final PhD viva. Arindam then continued entirely on his
>>>>>> own and in 2017 posted online a full set of YouTube videos with complete
>>>>>> details. In later years he made more powerful guns and developed the new
>>>>>> theory, got more powerful capacitors to show inertia violation very
>>>>>> clearly. This proving his new physics started back in 1998.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was responding to the claim that rail guns don't recoil.
>>>>
>>>> That is not entirely correct. The claim is that the electromagnetic
>>>> force accelerating the armature - under certain conditions - does NOT
>>>> have an equal and opposite reaction. Now mechanical force is needed to
>>>> launch the projectile upon the rails. That force has a reaction of
>>>> course. The recoil seen on videos is the reaction from the mechanical
>>>> component.
>>>
>>> There is no mechanical force in a railgun, all the force is
>>> electromagnetic, crackpot.
>>
>> Not so, penisnono Penisnino. If you just put 1000000 amps through a
>> static bullet it will just weld, melt. You have to give it an initial
>> velocity through mechanical or chemical or magnetic means, and all those
>> have the smallish recoil one can see in practical rail guns, including
>> Arindam's.
>
> Nonsense.
>
> While there are hybrid railguns that use a plasma arc to fire
> non-conducting projectiles, a pure railgun has a conducting projectile
> and two or more conducting rails and ALL motion is due to
> electromagnetics,
> crackpot.
>
> It appears you have no clue how a railgun actually works, crackpot.

Silly penisnono Penisnino, Arindam's new design rail gun or reactionless
motor follows far superior theory and practice than the stupid US 
designs like those using plasma. Because those designs were so lousy,
they were given up.

Note: penisnono = c**t
>
> <snip remaining utter nonsense>

Typical penisnono tactic.

Woof-woof woof woof woof woof-woof

Bertietaylor