Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: ChatGPT refutes the key rebuttal of my work
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 19:50:26 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <034767682966b9ac642993dd2fa0d181c21dfffc@i2pn2.org>
References: <vegfro$lk27$9@dont-email.me> <veimqs$14que$1@dont-email.me>
 <veipf3$15764$1@dont-email.me>
 <36ecdefcca730806c7bd9ec03e326fac1a9c8464@i2pn2.org>
 <vejcoj$1879f$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 23:50:27 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2070119"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vejcoj$1879f$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2292
Lines: 30

On 10/14/24 11:18 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 10/14/2024 7:06 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Mon, 14 Oct 2024 04:49:22 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 10/14/2024 4:04 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-10-13 12:53:12 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>>> Although it is possible for LLM systems to lie:
>>
>>>>> ChatGPT does correctly apply truth preserving operations to the
>>>>> premises that it was provided regarding the behavior of DDD and HHH.
>>>>> *Try to find a mistake in its reasoning*
>>>>
>>>> No reasoning shown.
>>>>
>>> https://chatgpt.com/share/6709e046-4794-8011-98b7-27066fb49f3e
>>> When you click on the link and try to explain how HHH must be wrong when
>>> it reports that DDD does not terminate because DDD does terminate it
>>> will explain your mistake to you.
>> It is nonsensical for HHH not to report that DDD terminates.
>>
> The explanation is quite good. I will take what you said
> to mean that it was over your head or didn't bother to
> look at it.
> 
> You never confirmed that you even know what infinite
> recursion is.
> 

No, he means your argument is just non-sense, and it is just a blantant 
lie that you put forwards because you just don't understand what you are 
talking about.,