Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: And the Richer Petard Horror Show resumes ... Libelous statement
 by Alan
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 21:38:47 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <05009882d9a39b146f2c6e8ce94dc007f26b8cfe@i2pn2.org>
References: <ve39pb$24k00$1@dont-email.me>
 <39f1a350cac0a8431753486526da1c35f458df65@i2pn2.org>
 <ve6lsa$207d$2@news.muc.de> <ve8289$336c8$1@dont-email.me>
 <ve91hf$1ab4$1@news.muc.de> <ve922i$37jpk$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 01:38:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1485281"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ve922i$37jpk$1@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3750
Lines: 69

On 10/10/24 1:14 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 10/10/2024 12:05 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> wrote:
>>> On 2024-10-09 19:34:34 +0000, Alan Mackenzie said:
>>
>>>> Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/8/24 8:49 AM, Andy Walker wrote:
>>>>>> ... after a short break.
>>
>>>>>>      Richard -- no-one sane carries on an extended discussion with
>>>>>> someone they [claim to] consider a "stupid liar".  So which are you?
>>>>>> Not sane?  Or stupid enough to try to score points off someone who is
>>>>>> incapable of conceding them?  Or lying when you describe Peter?  You
>>>>>> must surely have better things to do.  Meanwhile, you surely noticed
>>>>>> that Peter is running rings around you.
>>
>>>>> In other words, you don't understand the concept of defense of the 
>>>>> truth.
>>
>>>> Maybe, but continuously calling your debating opponent a liar, and 
>>>> doing
>>>> so in oversized upper case, goes beyond truth and comes perilously 
>>>> close
>>>> to stalking.
>>
>>> Calling a liar a liar is fully justified. I don't know how often it
>>> needs be done but readers of a liar may want to know that they are
>>> reading a liar.
>>
>> We know Peter Olcott has lied in things that matter.  However, I believe
>> his continual falsehoods are more a matter of delusion than mendacity.
>> As Mike Terry has said, OP's intellectual capacity is low.  Calling him
>> a liar in virtually every post is, I think, unwarranted.
>>
> 
> The fact that no one can even point out a single mistake
> conclusively proves that any lying is not on my side of
> the dialogue.

The fact that the errors HAVE been pointed out, and you just ignore them 
proves you to be just a plain liar.

If there are errors in the rebutals being made, actually point them out, 
the fact that you can't just proves you don't really have anything to 
base your "facts" on.

> 
> void DDD()
> {
>    HHH(DDD);
>    return;
> }
> 
> HHH is an x86 emulation based termination analyzer.
> Each DDD emulated by any HHH that it calls never returns.
> 
> Each of the directly executed HHH emulator/analyzers that returns
> 0 correctly reports the above non-terminating behavior of its input.

Which is just a lie based on equivocation, since 
terminating/non-terminating is a property of the direct running of the 
machine, NOT a partial emulation of it as HHH does, and the actual 
behavior is to halt, so can't be non-terminating.

> 
> Fully operational code is here.
> https://github.com/plolcott/x86utm/blob/master/Halt7.c
> 
>