| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<05aecd61e077904a7937269e7ff51659232ca538@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Simulation vs. Execution in the Halting Problem Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 07:35:22 -0400 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <05aecd61e077904a7937269e7ff51659232ca538@i2pn2.org> References: <yU0_P.1529838$4AM6.776697@fx17.ams4> <101a7uv$3vfam$5@dont-email.me> <101br7m$db03$1@dont-email.me> <101cjk7$hfof$7@dont-email.me> <101hdjt$21ui2$1@dont-email.me> <101iheg$2h3fr$1@dont-email.me> <101jhvm$33lln$1@dont-email.me> <101kfl3$3bfvj$4@dont-email.me> <101m9ps$3srp4$1@dont-email.me> <101nltk$7qau$10@dont-email.me> <101nmar$83vq$1@dont-email.me> <101nnjb$8rb8$2@dont-email.me> <101o8lo$db96$1@dont-email.me> <101oa1g$hd6o$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 11:35:44 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3243505"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird In-Reply-To: <101oa1g$hd6o$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2194 Lines: 27 On 6/3/25 10:11 PM, olcott wrote: > On 6/3/2025 8:48 PM, dbush wrote: >> On 6/3/2025 4:57 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 6/3/2025 3:35 PM, dbush wrote: >>>> On 6/3/2025 4:28 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 6/3/2025 2:55 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>> It proves nothing without a proof that DDD is correctly simulated >>>>>> by HHH. >>>>> >>>>> I have shown that proof too many times and people >>>>> denied the very obvious verified facts of it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> But you admitted on the record that it doesn't: >>>> >>> >>> Facts override and supersede opinions dip shit. >>> >> >> And it is a fact that you admitted on the record that DDD > > Is a damned lie. > No, it was a FACT, and you now trying to deny it is just a DAMNED LIE. Your problem is you don't seem to know what the words you are using actually mean.