Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<05qgtjl2i5i4e1nvepvh8sf2omji67gida@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: Job Offer
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:43:39 -0700
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <05qgtjl2i5i4e1nvepvh8sf2omji67gida@4ax.com>
References: <vr207a$1c7fg$1@dont-email.me> <JJ%AP.102161$3pn5.15133@fx44.iad> <vr22ot$1c7fh$7@dont-email.me> <LOgBP.37420$qx73.34564@fx01.iad> <vr4gva$e4h$5@dont-email.me> <xkDBP.83555$Sfe6.21630@fx35.iad> <vr7225$27ht8$1@dont-email.me> <q06etjl9l3f5q2n6koju974o7hoejsl9g2@4ax.com> <vr75sv$28c0d$1@dont-email.me> <9qbetjpheo5f0gike1t2kq0co704h16ln1@4ax.com> <vr855m$344sn$1@dont-email.me> <0saftjp1nlgbj68akbvukqa3o21j1d05gl@4ax.com> <vr9c3d$aeqa$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net UHF58v7SC8QO1ttEFTjkLw3KayhcYHcONHla1jKrMJ2V1XIfn0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LdbTq0jNqo7sdIlJcVCfu0aVFao= sha256:tU5mjM8W3q0aQN21PLo89OUEtpbZPuyqGqUfIDwtEdQ=
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Bytes: 2693

On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:37:34 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

>I do understand that last argument, but in our actual real 
>world a nation with insufficient defense quickly becomes not 
>a nation at all; dead or enslaved.
>
>US defense is as full of corruption, self dealing, waste and 
>inefficiency as everything else (such as road building or 
>the education racket or the Medical Billing racket) but 
>defense is still necessary, despite inefficiency.

I agree.  It's difficult to win an argument (or a war) from a position
of weakness.  That was the logic from the Cold War era, where the
country or bloc with the most atomic bombs would inevitably "win".
That translated into which bloc could spend the most on weapons.  The
Cold War ended when the Eastern bloc ran out of money (and credit).
The argument still holds validity, but the players seem to have agreed
to limit the scale and scope of arms buildup.  Whether that will
insure peace any better than uncontrolled military buildup is
uncertain.  I'm not worried about nations armed with atomic weapons.
I'm worried about smaller nations inventing ways to weaponize
literally everything.  

Hopefully, I won't live long enough to see the next war.  It probably
won't be pretty.  I don't know how to stop a trend that started with
tribalism and seems to be growing out of control.  The next war will
not have any winners.

-- 
Jeff Liebermann                 jeffl@cruzio.com
PO Box 272      http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
Skype: JeffLiebermann      AE6KS    831-336-2558