| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<05qgtjl2i5i4e1nvepvh8sf2omji67gida@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Job Offer Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:43:39 -0700 Lines: 33 Message-ID: <05qgtjl2i5i4e1nvepvh8sf2omji67gida@4ax.com> References: <vr207a$1c7fg$1@dont-email.me> <JJ%AP.102161$3pn5.15133@fx44.iad> <vr22ot$1c7fh$7@dont-email.me> <LOgBP.37420$qx73.34564@fx01.iad> <vr4gva$e4h$5@dont-email.me> <xkDBP.83555$Sfe6.21630@fx35.iad> <vr7225$27ht8$1@dont-email.me> <q06etjl9l3f5q2n6koju974o7hoejsl9g2@4ax.com> <vr75sv$28c0d$1@dont-email.me> <9qbetjpheo5f0gike1t2kq0co704h16ln1@4ax.com> <vr855m$344sn$1@dont-email.me> <0saftjp1nlgbj68akbvukqa3o21j1d05gl@4ax.com> <vr9c3d$aeqa$2@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net UHF58v7SC8QO1ttEFTjkLw3KayhcYHcONHla1jKrMJ2V1XIfn0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:LdbTq0jNqo7sdIlJcVCfu0aVFao= sha256:tU5mjM8W3q0aQN21PLo89OUEtpbZPuyqGqUfIDwtEdQ= User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Bytes: 2693 On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:37:34 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >I do understand that last argument, but in our actual real >world a nation with insufficient defense quickly becomes not >a nation at all; dead or enslaved. > >US defense is as full of corruption, self dealing, waste and >inefficiency as everything else (such as road building or >the education racket or the Medical Billing racket) but >defense is still necessary, despite inefficiency. I agree. It's difficult to win an argument (or a war) from a position of weakness. That was the logic from the Cold War era, where the country or bloc with the most atomic bombs would inevitably "win". That translated into which bloc could spend the most on weapons. The Cold War ended when the Eastern bloc ran out of money (and credit). The argument still holds validity, but the players seem to have agreed to limit the scale and scope of arms buildup. Whether that will insure peace any better than uncontrolled military buildup is uncertain. I'm not worried about nations armed with atomic weapons. I'm worried about smaller nations inventing ways to weaponize literally everything. Hopefully, I won't live long enough to see the next war. It probably won't be pretty. I don't know how to stop a trend that started with tribalism and seems to be growing out of control. The next war will not have any winners. -- Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272 Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558