| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<06139f3ec993780eff29ddc2706ed6bd@novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Oh my God! Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 01:13:05 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <06139f3ec993780eff29ddc2706ed6bd@novabbs.com> References: <Ev7wMrtKlxguxDn1RDUke8-o3Zo@jntp> <vd0ojs$3l9ep$1@dont-email.me> <llkd25FlhobU6@mid.individual.net> <ZoXepwEI4CdYzUI6TGjcOT0vC0Q@jntp> <llpubiFgheaU8@mid.individual.net> <Zq1pHnYCgAwr5qC37tYAjjYmORY@jntp> <c343b16e27e0220d0b586aadaac601bb@www.novabbs.com> <38a724f9aa7028dc455f71fda36abdb8@www.novabbs.com> <ad8212d173bdfb8447f337e7cbc13dda@novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="32286"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="ovbq/l84ala/wLhXSqScU9GOSIzjukMrxJB27Aq7eyg"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: c1a997029c70f718720f72156b7d7f56416caf7c X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$JuvKpuTniUwm0UEi9sf2GeSuAk80C321fQC2/0J.YpJqKckCQNdRu X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2280 Lines: 23 On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 23:48:27 +0000, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:53:41 +0000, gharnagel wrote: >> So let's look at the figure on the right with v = 0.1c. As viewed >> from S, t1 = \gamma (0 + 0.1L) = 0.1gL. At that time in S, the time >> in C is not at t = 0. This is relativity of simultaneity (RoS). >> Prok, YOU are the one trying to rip SR to shreds by pretending you >> can ignore RoS. Figures 4 and 5 in DOI: 10.13189/ujpa.2023.170101 >> obey RoS, your figures do not. In the left panel of my triptych, a tachyonic signal is emitted at (x',t') = (D,0) and is received at (x',t') = (C,0) In the middle panel of my triptych, a tachyonic signal is emitted at (x',t') = (D,0) and is received at (x',t') = (C,0) In the right panel of my triptych, a tachyonic signal is emitted at (x',t') = (D,0) and is received at (x',t') = (C,0) In other words, my motions as an observer can do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to alter the emission and receipt of the signals as measured in S' To believe otherwise is insane.