Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<0678040070c634b30141edfab996b3e522f4a74d.camel@gmail.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: How to write a self-referencial TM? Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 06:35:33 +0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 311 Message-ID: <0678040070c634b30141edfab996b3e522f4a74d.camel@gmail.com> References: <1e4f1a15826e67e7faf7a3c2104d09e9dadc6f06.camel@gmail.com> <1002akp$2i4bk$2@dont-email.me> <479eebef3bd93e82c8fe363908b254b11d15a799.camel@gmail.com> <1002jkk$2k00a$3@dont-email.me> <05e306f20fcb7c88c497e353aaecd36b30fc752a.camel@gmail.com> <10053hb$3759k$1@dont-email.me> <879b3c552bad9da9885e41a298b570c92bef1aaf.camel@gmail.com> <10061h6$3de5f$1@dont-email.me> <4bce5af2b2b8cd198af611e5d8d56598cab15b0a.camel@gmail.com> <10067ok$3ib39$1@dont-email.me> <e63d3083ddf6b9ab172cc24c07155410d81ce5b4.camel@gmail.com> <1007lrp$3r388$1@dont-email.me> <0cbe88d46c63af596e4d2ad6a846e61b7efb14bb.camel@gmail.com> <1008fhf$53u$1@dont-email.me> <cd31647abcc33f0978415df34ec2c8d41d886591.camel@gmail.com> <100a7e4$efgi$1@dont-email.me> <f94f006b40c3ca204d41be9b4507280a3a4fc17b.camel@gmail.com> <100aolc$hq2u$1@dont-email.me> <943f3512f1c253f770eb41519145d4159c0cd6aa.camel@gmail.com> <100dhiv$167g2$1@dont-email.me> <53caddf143d1319d6aef95fb8b349f6b6e07d288.camel@gmail.com> <100dlrb$16vdn$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 00:35:36 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="745d7f42001f5c9522e6574626815520"; logging-data="1296289"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/wr8+WAoctDDWoOJwOZtAN" User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Rz29LhjkUUcE5Bm3kKWgbi9Op3A= In-Reply-To: <100dlrb$16vdn$3@dont-email.me> Bytes: 15185 On Sun, 2025-05-18 at 17:09 -0500, olcott wrote: > On 5/18/2025 4:46 PM, wij wrote: > > On Sun, 2025-05-18 at 15:57 -0500, olcott wrote: > > > On 5/18/2025 3:35 PM, wij wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2025-05-17 at 14:39 -0500, olcott wrote: > > > > > On 5/17/2025 2:26 PM, wij wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 2025-05-17 at 15:45 +0100, Mike Terry wrote: > > > > > > > On 17/05/2025 04:01, wij wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2025-05-16 at 23:51 +0100, Mike Terry wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 16/05/2025 20:35, wij wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2025-05-16 at 16:33 +0100, Mike Terry wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 16/05/2025 12:40, wij wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2025-05-16 at 03:26 +0100, Mike Terry wrote= : > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 16/05/2025 02:47, wij wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2025-05-16 at 01:40 +0100, Mike Terry w= rote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 15/05/2025 19:49, wij wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:08 +0100, Mike Ter= ry wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 14/05/2025 18:53, wij wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2025-05-14 at 12:24 -0500, olco= tt wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/14/2025 11:43 AM, wij wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2025-05-14 at 09:51 -0500, = olcott wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/14/2025 12:13 AM, wij wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Q: Write a turing machine that = performs D function (which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > calls > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > void D() { > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 D(); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Easy? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is not a TM. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is a C program that exists. Ther= efore, there must be a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > equivalent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > TM. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To make a TM that references itse= lf the closest > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thing is a UTM that simulates its= own TM source-code. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How does a UTM simulate its own TM = source-code? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You run a UTM that has its own source= -code on its tape. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is exactly the source-code on its = tape? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Every UTM has some scheme which can be ap= plied to a (TM & input > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tape) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scheme says how to turn the (TM + input t= ape) into a string of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > symbols > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > represent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > computation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So to answer your question, the "source-c= ode on its tape" is the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > result > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > applying > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UTM's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > particular scheme to the combination (UTM= , input tape) that is to be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you're looking for the exact string sy= mbols, obviously you would > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > specify > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > exact > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UTM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > being used, because every UTM will have a= different answer to your > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > question. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > People used to say UTM can simulate all TM.= I was questing such a UTM. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Because you said "Every UTM ...", so what i= s the source of such UTM? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, a UTM can simulate any TM including itse= lf.=C2=A0 (Nothing magical > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > changes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > UTM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simulates > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself, as opposed to some other TM.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Supposed UTM exists, and denoted as U(X), X den= otes the tape contents of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > encoding of a TM. And, U(X) should function the= same like X. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Given instance U(U(f)), it should function like= f from the above > > > > > > > > > > > > > > definition. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But, U(U(f)) would fall into a 'self-reference'= trap. > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no self-reference trap. > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > In your notation: > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > -=C2=A0 f represents some computation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -=C2=A0 U(f) represents U being run with f on its= tape. > > > > > > > > > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0 Note this is itself a computation, distinct from f of course > > > > > > > > > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0 but having the same behaviour. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -=C2=A0 U(U(f)) represents U simulating the previ= ous computation. > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no reason U(f) cannot be simulated by U.= =C2=A0 U will have no knowledge > > > > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > "simulating > > > > > > > > > > > > > itself", and will just simulate what it is given. > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike. > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for not being clear on the UTM issue (I wante= d to mean several things in > > > > > > > > > > > > one ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========