Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<06gn2jh80t3l7i2sk4uvu1srujqare99r2@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: CCFL transformer
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:57:24 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 62
Message-ID: <06gn2jh80t3l7i2sk4uvu1srujqare99r2@4ax.com>
References: <v09htg$1tjdf$2@dont-email.me> <66rk2jl35lbgd2tnqc6jjoqsd70ig9d485@4ax.com> <v0dt9i$32s0p$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:55:48 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ffb4f4ce7bbbd7c9ba305c473bbfabda";
	logging-data="3950572"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lL56NGFfeRS+AZ4an1doZ"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v5jpBJuidylR1zDGn8ZdHm/1K4w=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Bytes: 3216

On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 01:36:06 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
wrote:

>On 26/04/2024 12:52 am, legg wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 01:57:36 +0200, Klaus Vestergaard Kragelund
>> <klauskvik@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I need a low distributed capacitance winding transformer, for a HV
>>> stepup function (3.5kV)
>>>
>>> I am zeroing in on similar concept as CCFL transformers with
>>> sectionalized bobbin.
>>>
>>> For example:
>>>
>>> https://www.coilcraft.com/en-us/products/transformers/power-transformers/ccfl-transformers/fl/
>>>
>>> Possibly using Triple Insulated Wire to create some distance between the
>>> individual turns.
>>>
>>> Not many sells CCFLs these days.
>>>
>>> Guess I will keep it alive....
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Klaus
>> 
>> Stress between turns is limited by v/n limit of core. It's layer
>> stress and section stress that you have to deal with.
>> That's what the multisection bobbin and pancake windings do.
>
>They also reduce the parallel capacitance of the windings, and give you 
>are higher resonant frequency for the transformer as a whole.
>
>"Layer stress" and "section stress" aren't specific electronic 
>engineering terms, and the "v/n" limit of the core is pretty vague.
>
>There is a volt per turn limit imposed by the magnetic field that 
>saturates the core - but at higher frequencies you can tolerate more 
>volts per turn before the core saturates - it's a linear function of 
>switching frequency, up to the point where resistance around the current 
>loops inside the core lets enough current circulate to heat the core 
>above its Curie temperature.
>
>> If the CCFL transformer will allow only 1600V, imagine the
>> precautions required for 3x that stress. I'm not sure you
>> can avoid vacuum impregnation / potting in anything 'small'.
>
>Imagination does seem to be what's being applied here.
>
>There's a least one truly horrible 1969 text book on transformer design
>
>https://www.amazon.com.au/Soft-Ferrites-Applications-C-Snelling/dp/0408027606
>
>and it took me years to realise quite how confusing it was.

https://archive.org/details/SNELLING__SOFT-FERRITES__1969/page/n13/mode/2up?view=theater

RL