Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD specifies recursive emulation to HHH and halting to HHH1 ---
 STA
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2025 22:56:07 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <098f6195d1988e7ad05d4f69be1b50f8e276d753@i2pn2.org>
References: <vrfuob$256og$1@dont-email.me> <vs9h9o$23cav$2@dont-email.me>
 <vs9hh3$20g2j$6@dont-email.me> <vs9jie$23cav$4@dont-email.me>
 <vs9kb1$26cg5$2@dont-email.me> <vs9pni$27rl4$9@dont-email.me>
 <vs9r1b$28tqg$2@dont-email.me> <vs9t45$2f6n5$1@dont-email.me>
 <9f2ff3ab9b99a7bb6dfa0885f9757f810ce52e66@i2pn2.org>
 <vsaam4$2sfhq$1@dont-email.me> <vsbi7e$1hblk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsc6qi$27lbo$2@dont-email.me>
 <8a3e7e93e6cad20b29d23405a0e6dbd497a492ac@i2pn2.org>
 <vscegq$2fv3s$2@dont-email.me>
 <26f33bb039fda7d28ae164cfc4d0f582d4698f31@i2pn2.org>
 <vsclsb$2n4jc$1@dont-email.me>
 <36a4c76730b23cf78ddde73c723116b5380973a1@i2pn2.org>
 <vsctnm$2ub5m$2@dont-email.me>
 <4285ea3219a2d5f2d6c52e84697fa4e3d3dc80cb@i2pn2.org>
 <vsd18m$379dn$1@dont-email.me> <vsdjff$3o5ff$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsem50$th5g$3@dont-email.me>
 <77c20f5832db4b47f5226dcb39bd2be7ba107a0c@i2pn2.org>
 <vsf8tv$1i673$2@dont-email.me>
 <829df7c882a73597e03bfaf34aa7883cbb74acd3@i2pn2.org>
 <vsksj5$378kj$12@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 03:04:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2897382"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vsksj5$378kj$12@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2786
Lines: 23

On 4/2/25 10:42 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 4/2/2025 9:06 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Mon, 31 Mar 2025 18:36:30 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 3/31/2025 5:32 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 3/31/25 2:16 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> A simulating termination analyzer is always correct to abort the
>>>>> simulation and reject the input as non-halting when-so-ever this input
>>>>> would otherwise prevent itself from halting.
>>>>>
>>>> But the input WILL halt, when it is correctly emulated.
>>>>
>>> Where "correct" is defined to disagree with the x86 language.
>> How is DDD incorrectly simulated to halt?
>>
> 
> You have never shown that you understand recursion
> much less recursive emulation.
> 

We could say the same about you.

You also haven't shown an understanding of Truth, program, or logic.

Sorry, you are just sinking your reputation in the lake of fire.