Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:42:53 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <0a60561a46469241ef48d15f6f5ad2c25e6fc95d@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me>
	<vq6jam$1qp5e$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
	<vq729j$1tapm$2@dont-email.me>
	<b36a796cf1fbda692a37c664df66c22b6d7807c6@i2pn2.org>
	<vq7941$1u8bl$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:42:53 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2839212"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2217
Lines: 23

Am Tue, 04 Mar 2025 10:18:09 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 3/4/2025 9:38 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Tue, 04 Mar 2025 08:21:39 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>> On 3/4/2025 4:06 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>>> Am 04.03.2025 um 04:07 schrieb olcott:
>> 
>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>>> The only valid rebuttal is to show all of the steps of exactly how
>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH reaches its own "ret" instruction.
>>>> You're wrong; your program will never stop - like your halting
>>>> problem investigations.
>>> I am not wrong and no one can show that I wrong The only valid
>>> rebuttal is to show all of the steps of exactly how DD correctly
>>> emulated by HHH reaches its own "ret" instruction. NO ONE CAN DO THAT
>>> BECAUSE I AM CORRECT
>> Cool. Now that you've made your point, would you please shut up?
> Agree that I am correct or prove that I am wrong.
> I MUST HAVE CLOSURE!!!
I have bad news for you.

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.