| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<0ae7fef8aecfb821347a2c7f4f8db96b@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Electron size, shape and spin.Confusion and conflicts with Einstein's 1905 SR. Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:05:02 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <0ae7fef8aecfb821347a2c7f4f8db96b@www.novabbs.com> References: <8d05bbe123c740f2934b31e367a92231@www.novabbs.com> <65006a73bc196736fbec3d54e21fa717@www.novabbs.com> <vr9tmf$q4vi$1@dont-email.me> <0c0b2bb49434e61879858abed2b9d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <vrbtgj$2k1q7$1@dont-email.me> <a1b3bbfca4b1e9797d98903a77f0cf59@www.novabbs.com> <f58a6ba75e73908078c5576f74ffe329@www.novabbs.com> <9ed9e92086e0d99fde7d81edfced643a@www.novabbs.com> <0082c223a6c8e6952b11ec32b83c473b@www.novabbs.com> <d38ac7fb8de3a1e3c8f08908a6e1953a@www.novabbs.com> <40f0e2c10ed1e2c2d24989b4c7917802@www.novabbs.com> <vrf73v$1iffb$1@dont-email.me> <c6032fd09dd139befbdfc8b5d8b477b6@www.novabbs.com> <vri0qb$30cv$1@dont-email.me> <43d5f4c5dc0bb6403360e6d899866f5b@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1138774"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="TRF929uvrTGZYJLF+N3tVBXNVfr/PeoSjsJ9hd5hWzo"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$qrt7OnRuFaDirGqS7tg7xO2PQVCsgYXqD7jhrn2Nh//ixbg9L9aDW X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: cefb4c33981645a229d345bae7bb8942e6b32c35 Bytes: 5739 Lines: 101 On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 23:33:47 +0000, rhertz wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 21:24:30 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote: > > > > Well, since the GPS doesn't work it is no point in trying to > > make you believe that it does, is it? :-D > > Nice analysis, Paul. Well redacted and with many details. > > Only THAT YOU FUCKED IT UP, AS YOU USUALLY DO! No, he didn't. Hertz doesn't seem to be a conscious entity. > The master TCXO clock on the GPS SV have (according to the narrative of > 1977 relativists), TWO OPERATING MODES: > > M1: Working at 10,230,000.000000 Hz (as good physics dictates) > M2: Working at 10,229,999.995430 Hz (as relativists claim it to be > necessary) This was only true for the first ones in orbit. Your M1 scenario hasn't been implemented for decades. > Your BLUNDER is that working in M2, the onboard counter has LESS COUNTS, > NOT MORE, after the 86,400 sec/day. Hertz's blunder is that he conflates time on board with time on the ground. His pseudo-Newtonian mind is incapable of understanding reality. (I say pseudo-Newtonian because he seems unable to understand even Newtonian physics). > So, your count is incorrect. > > Clock on Earth station: accumulates 883,872,000,000 pulses in 86400 sec. > > Working on M2 mode, clock on the GPS SV accumulates 883,871,999,608 > pulses in 86400 sec. Hertz's problem is that, once again, he doesn't understand 86400 seconds on earth is not 86400 seconds in orbit. The onboard clock operates on signals from the master frequency. If the master frequency has been lowered, then the clock will run slow, so the master clock will still receive 86400 per "day." Poor, poor Richard. He is way out of his depth. > as measured IN THE SV. So, the count gives (86400s - 38.575μs). It's > a LOWER LOCAL VALUE within the GPS SV. > > What relativists claim, because they are IDIOTS, is that such difference > DISAPPEAR IN THIN AIR when PERCEIVED FROM EARTH (Ground level). And they > celebrate that due to relativistic corrections, the L1 frequency REACHES > EARTH with an increase in frequency of Δf/f = -4.4647E-10. So an increase is negative? That explains a lot about Hertz's brain. > Such relativistic correction, idiots claim, allow that the L1 carrier > emitted from the SV at 1,575,419,999.29622 Hz COULD REACH EARTH AT > EXACTLY 1,575,420,000.000 Hz = 154 x 10,230,000.000000 Hz. As Paul tirelessly explains, the carrier frequency experiences the Doppler effect due to the speed of the satellites (sigh!). > Is that clear enough? The act of detuning the SV TCXO causes a LOSS > OF 38.5 usec on the orbiting clock. Hertz is trying to confuse the issue by referring to the on-board clock. He's no engineer. An engineer would understand that if an oscillator was adjusted to operate at a lower frequency and a counter received that signal, he wouldn't be wondering where the "extra pulses" (received BEFORE the oscillator was detuned) went :-)) > But FROM EARTH, it's perceived AS IF THAT DIFFERENCE HAS BEEN > CANCELLED, because Schwarzschild advised so. But the fact is that the slower clock in orbit matches the master clock on the ground. Not because Schwarzschild "advised so" but because that is what REALLY happens. We believe we know WHY it happens because the theory matches experiment. > Don't be confused about the values of time and frequency. Two sides of > the same coin. > > Which is the truth? Relativity IS FALSE, A FALLACIOUS PSEUDOSCIENCE, AND > THE ORBITING CLOCK WORKS ONLY IN THE M1 MODE. There is no M1 mode on board, and there hasn't been for decades. > Or, as Maciej always say, t'=t. You would quote Malicious Maciej for justification? That fool has been posting lies for decades also. > Please, hold on with your butthurt, or try some cream to easy the pain. Hertz is the one with buttHertz. Weird Wozniak believes Newtonian physics is proved because t' = t, but like ButtHertz, he doesn't define his terms correctly, or at all. It's unclear whether ButtHertz is malicious or just incredibly stupid.