Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<0b2a9964adf7d9511b45fe4e5bc1f3010d115295@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary) Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 14:20:35 -0500 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <0b2a9964adf7d9511b45fe4e5bc1f3010d115295@i2pn2.org> References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vjam6d$1700v$1@dont-email.me> <vjc65g$1i9vk$3@dont-email.me> <vjf7kl$2s7e5$1@dont-email.me> <vjfmq3$2upa9$3@dont-email.me> <c6b624cb0b1b55d54aab969ee5b4e283ec7be3cd@i2pn2.org> <vjhp8b$3gjbv$1@dont-email.me> <dc9e7638be92c4d158f238f8c042c8559cd46521@i2pn2.org> <vjjg6p$3tvsg$1@dont-email.me> <c31edc62508876748c8cf69f93ab80c0a7fd84ac@i2pn2.org> <vjka3b$1tms$3@dont-email.me> <e11a34c507a23732d83e3d0fcde7b609cdaf3ade@i2pn2.org> <vjmse3$k2go$2@dont-email.me> <069069bf23698c157ddfd9b62b9b2f632b484c40@i2pn2.org> <vjooeq$11n0g$2@dont-email.me> <2d3620a6e2a8a57d9db7a33c9d476fe03cac455b@i2pn2.org> <vjrfcc$1m1b2$1@dont-email.me> <75921cc1f17cdb691969a99e666f237cd09c0b09@i2pn2.org> <vjsrp1$1tqvv$2@dont-email.me> <25729298b142c60d5b245231984119d42d4ac089@i2pn2.org> <vko14j$53b6$3@dont-email.me> <vko1vp$5mmo$1@dont-email.me> <vkovk1$b7ki$1@dont-email.me> <6d1eddd3fbf2b84297a25a283466799eef07cb3f@i2pn2.org> <vkp9v6$dofu$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2024 19:20:35 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="904206"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg"; User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 In-Reply-To: <vkp9v6$dofu$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2983 Lines: 24 On 12/28/24 11:45 AM, WM wrote: > On 28.12.2024 15:15, Richard Damon wrote: >> doing an INFIITE union (which a union of all FISONs would be) can >> result in something different in type then the union of a finite >> number of FISONs. > > Every FISON covers less than half of all natural numbers. That implies > that all FISONs and the union of all FISONs cover less than half of all > natural numbers. > > Regards, WM Nope, unsupported logic, In fact, every Fision covers a negligable part of All Natural Numbers, just as every Natural number is a negligable %-tile of the whole of the Natural Numbers. Your problem is that you just don't understand the absoute power of an infinite set of finite values because your brain is just too small and doesn't understand what it is talking about. Sorry, you are really just that stupid and you are just showing that your brain melted in the explosion of your logic system when it exploded into smithereens from the contradictions created by your illogical logic.