Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<0cmtmjpqqm98ohk459r9dss91ndh0ue3c6@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect.
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 11:46:21 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 119
Message-ID: <0cmtmjpqqm98ohk459r9dss91ndh0ue3c6@4ax.com>
References: <a2ndmj97tmjflpvjdte7mh5rvsro3o5egu@4ax.com> <vk6r7i$4akb$4@dont-email.me> <4ubgmjdmd8rdfictqu5il3pg60ns81746b@4ax.com> <vk9lf2$nssq$4@dont-email.me> <4klimjdulc9vbb00lkgjmdkqdml2ahork9@4ax.com> <vkc49q$19n3s$2@dont-email.me> <gnalmjhejoulcnj1snqjhl03gn8hclqacg@4ax.com> <vkf6s7$210ao$4@dont-email.me> <hgcomjtn00pi56iepht8unlmo5uqm148f5@4ax.com> <vkhfhr$2fvsk$2@dont-email.me> <8qsqmjlikhmjfivakeo7csm9qvnts2ausu@4ax.com> <vkk2dv$32is4$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2024 17:46:22 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="375ba694da3d1ce9672b7a0c1f52ebc7";
	logging-data="3905410"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/uDuZPNFtsDUNYxnGatJwhDdmmGTAlaCc="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eNOaBasnZeLcpN1+isdV9kxNrsk=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 241227-2, 12/27/2024), Outbound message
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
Bytes: 6402

On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 12:06:05 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:

>On 12/26/2024 10:17 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 12:31:38 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 12/25/2024 11:26 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:51:18 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/24/2024 7:37 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2024 11:48:57 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/23/2024 7:25 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Dec 2024 13:23:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/22/2024 10:27 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:43:29 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/21/2024 10:19 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:12:54 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/20/2024 7:04 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 14:42:58 -0500, shawn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:53:45 -0500, EGK <memyself@null.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:31:32 -0500, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 01:31:39 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/18/2024 4:28 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:57:19 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your President-elect forcibly finger fucked her.  Explain *that* fact.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump was not convicted of rape.  ABC said he was.  They lied.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> End of story.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In other jurisdictions it's considered rape/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But he wasn't in other jurisdictions.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The harm to Donald Trump wws nominal. not $15 million worth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ABC obviously felt otherwise given that they caved so quickly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They didnt want to go through discovery and be exposed as the biased
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> organization most of the media is.  ABC producers warned Stephanopolous not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to use the term "rape" and he just thumbed his nose at them and did it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repeatedly anyway.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/media/abc-parent-disney-didnt-think-it-would-beat-trump-in-court-report/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He could still likely have gotten away with it if he had said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something like "I think he's guilty of rape" while still giving the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> official legal facts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's not forget he was verbally attacking a rape victim during the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> interview.  Way to go Boy George.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he was verbally (albeit indirectly) attacking a rapist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Did you see the interview?  He was extremely aggressive towards her.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Disgraceful behavior.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I agree.  He was extremely aggressive towards her disgraceful behavior.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What disgraceful bbehavior did she exhibit?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> She stonewalled his question by chanting a baseless accusation.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What "baseless accusation"?
>>>>>>>> You have this completely backwards.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, "backwards" is certainly what she was going for.  She tried to
>>>>>>> turn his question ("How can a rapee support a rapist?") into shaming
>>>>>>> raped women for their "political choices".  I can't even begin...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Look at you blaming the (literal) victim.
>>>>>> You're pathetic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you parrot her faithfully.
>>>>>
>>>> Your evasion is noted and is your admission that you've lost the
>>>> discussion.
>>>
>>> If I had nickel for every self-declared "victor"...
>>>
>> 
>> You make a claim and are completely unable to either defend it or have
>> a reasonable explanation for your position.  This is the very
>> definition of "loss".  You did it to yourself.
>> 
>> Deal with it.
>
>Okay... what did I blame on a "literal victim"?  What did George?  Think 
>carefully, now...
>

Perhaps you need to review the video of the interview before
commenting further.  Agressively interviewing a rape victim using a
false claim as the basis of the discussion is "blaming the victim".

Think carefully, now...