Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Overcoming the proof of undecidability of the Halting Problem by
 a simple example in C
Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 07:00:03 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <0d782bae46342a3363628c24c321a332e4ecd3a9@i2pn2.org>
References: <1005jsk$3akrk$1@dont-email.me>
 <bc6f0f045212bdfb7f7d883426873a09e37789ea@i2pn2.org>
 <1005u6v$3cpt2$1@dont-email.me> <1005v0p$3b07v$1@dont-email.me>
 <10063u0$3dmiv$1@dont-email.me> <1006on8$3l9t7$1@dont-email.me>
 <1007kgq$3qb7l$9@dont-email.me> <1009lm9$b15q$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ceum$uvq0$1@dont-email.me> <87ecwl1s2p.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <100dscu$18b5s$1@dont-email.me> <87v7pxzbp4.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <100du9m$18m8u$1@dont-email.me> <100dvuj$18b5q$2@dont-email.me>
 <100e17m$194d7$1@dont-email.me> <100e3qo$1d7a1$1@dont-email.me>
 <100e5g1$1do0r$1@dont-email.me> <100e7qg$1e5fs$1@dont-email.me>
 <100e9ns$1ee1a$1@dont-email.me> <100eb2m$1ejgp$1@dont-email.me>
 <100ebsj$1eo7p$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 11:09:59 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1014424"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <100ebsj$1eo7p$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 5/19/25 12:25 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/18/2025 11:12 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 19/05/2025 04:49, olcott wrote:
>>
>> ...a load of nonsense that didn't address my reply at all. I won't 
>> rebut it point by point because I have already dealt with all of his 
>> remarks, some of them several times over.
>>
>> < SNIP! >
>>
>> I'm beginning to wonder whether he ever learned to read for 
>> comprehension.
>>
> 
> That you tried to get away with dodging my point
> and were mad when you got busted is noted.
> I have an OCD like focus on a few single points.
> 
> Most all of my reviewers are totally scatter-brained
> not being able to stay focused on a single point until
> complete closure is achieved.
> 

That you can't actually clearly state a point without lying shows that 
you are just a pathological liar.

THe problem isn't in the reviewers, it is that the material they are 
reviewing is just so full of errors that nothing can be done but point 
them out.

You are just creating a target rich environment.

If you want to focus on a single point, good, when that point is shown 
to be based on error, you need to fix it.

You aren't allowed to stipulate things that are not true, that is just 
lying.

That you don't understand that is what makes you just a pathological liar.