Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<0eeef9f58734ccd795a86d9b7b02a7e9@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Einstein still sucks, after all these years. Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2024 12:30:04 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <0eeef9f58734ccd795a86d9b7b02a7e9@www.novabbs.com> References: <367a05faa8f01479dcdaf8830f10dcf7@www.novabbs.com> <e8b29c5101fbc103960fd726448cb9c5@www.novabbs.com> <14a2a927a6538adba1250e968096d842@www.novabbs.com> <CXFBO.21981$b6j.15432@fx11.ams4> <10fea9950896ac733f4c688b1322dcdb@www.novabbs.com> <vbadl3$3v15v$2@dont-email.me> <17f2245497b85697$828672$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <vbagep$3uuc5$3@dont-email.me> <4b0ee2b8b33c7f434476e1149c48ed3f@www.novabbs.com> <vbc8vg$b7vf$1@dont-email.me> <20f177818d9a30f262693d59594796b3@www.novabbs.com> <vbd53f$famd$2@dont-email.me> <17f28da44368d012$924913$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1056654"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$z1HMGGCWjX2T.oYXT8WIjuAD.6PKHAJVBXoEfIZfK2OVOqURF.ERK Bytes: 2262 Lines: 22 On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 4:35:45 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 05.09.2024 o 22:43, Paul.B.Andersen pisze: > > > > So what is most probable: > > 1. Richard Hertz is wrong. > > 2. All physicist since 1905 are frauds. > > Both are very probable. Says the self-proclaimed "information engineer." Very probably a disinformation engineer. After all, what do you get when information is "engineered"? Very probably manipulated truth, from observing Wozniak's behavior. He want's a "number" for what the GPS satellite clock reads, with the dishonest assumption that it must be read from the ground, but that's not the correct definition of t'. So the answer is NOT a number, it's an explanation which Wozniak deletes because it's inconvenient for his devious designs.