Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Arindam's cyberdogs know better physics than the Nobel prizewinners.
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 22:12:27 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <0fd83bc20ff3cc2f18f577571b215cdd@www.novabbs.com>
References: <ZirGyZChFLCJHn2I10rj5Yz94Xo@jntp> <gvqJXv44u1JJT5R5sjuZnSw_tmA@jntp> <bbycnfPRcfPN6Lf7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <235a34a772f4d12300050b6bed0568b0@www.novabbs.com> <kk62gk-gjuj.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <45cfed6dc66ff19efa97744d8e0c5abb@www.novabbs.com> <3c63gk-r74l.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2970344"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="jh4HcpQ+hhhSYfMNELHwaYsVz4DxLTJw0pxiKoD05d4";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$6YVOLFIBPAmpZeNOGtiIEe85PR1y8vSE.AnEZvh6QZUbL1wd1pfaK
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cdf973c28ddff5d1d1235bf54e7ff9676b462801
Bytes: 3195
Lines: 40

Jim Pennino wrote:

> In sci.physics.electromag bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> Jim Pennino wrote:
>> 
>>> In sci.physics.electromag bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 04/25/2024 01:05 AM, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>> Einstein's theories are pure nonsense. They depend upon the constancy of
>>>>>> the speed of light, which is wrong. Light speed actually varies with the
>>>>>> speed of the emitter. Then the optical effect of refraction was abused
>>>>>> to make it appear that the Sun bent the light from the stars. His
>>>>>> theories led to the concept of a finite but expanding universe. Now
>>>>>> Hubble and Webb telescopes show an infinite universe, with distant
>>>>>> galaxies NOT moving away at high speeds but going in all directions.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> I'm sort of a fan of this guy: https://www.deltaveng.com/ .
>>>>> He demonstrates some coilguns he put together with off-the-shelf parts.
>>>> 
>>>> Coilguns are not railguns. Totally different technologies.
>>>> Arindam invented a new type of railgun with parallel rails spread wide apart, heavy armature and low voltage requirement with low reistance for high currents.
>>>> That design has been stolen by the US Navy and employed in its most modern ships.
>> 
>> 
>>> Wrong on oh so many counts.
>> 
>>> After 15 years and $500 million in research, the US Navy gave up on
>>> railguns in 2021.
>> 
>>> Railguns were never deployed on Navy ships other than for testing.
>> 
>> The photo of their new barrel based on Arindam's new design is on Arindam's Facebook timeline. On 10 March. It shows clearly twin barrels and mentions 500 million dollars. Trials are going on.

> Nope, totally shut down in 2021.

Wrong. 2024 photo shows otherwise. They have fitted Arindam's new design rail gun barrel to their earlier power supply to make a devastating weapon.

bt