| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<0gdfgl-kpgd1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jim Pennino <jimp@gonzo.specsol.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.usage.english
Subject: Re: The Orange One
Followup-To: sci.physics
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 17:27:14 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 99
Message-ID: <0gdfgl-kpgd1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References: <hV9WP.65398$cb1.46436@fx09.ams1> <74fagl-doo61.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <cdf23d46e71a8003b7318f60db1e186f@www.novabbs.org> <67hbgl-8vv71.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <e3d2c9a6246edc8fcdae795efcc2e9a3@www.novabbs.org> <c9jbgl-8c581.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <19a3f28e9548213b6956f8ab3ece036f@www.novabbs.org> <c88dgl-aiga1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <a744c7a5c74cea82a14a59a1a7e7d222@www.novabbs.org> <m8degl-kr0c1.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <b60175e271f231e1f6b9a23f7e093d9a@www.novabbs.org>
Injection-Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 02:31:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bbe9da3fa5527a431bc514e6cf775c6a";
logging-data="2387713"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Py6nrmwqIehCcHYvxYLAj"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-140-lowlatency (x86_64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2+HMGPJfXjB4Jp6/S3/9cRczm0g=
Bytes: 5431
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2025 15:17:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>
>> In sci.physics bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 May 2025 4:45:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>
>>>> In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 25 May 2025 13:41:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In sci.physics bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 25 May 2025 13:06:16 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip huge pile of old crap>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fact: Arindam had no instrumentation, which means no data, which means
>>>>>>>> he has no clue what actually happened in his so called experiment that
>>>>>>>> slowly rolled a pipe and nothing more.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Facts:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip huge pile of links to youtube videos with no list of
>>>>>> instrumentation>
>>>>>
>>>>> Simple multimeter, video camera, self generated software, measuring and
>>>>> weight scales are enough instrumentation for Arindam
>>>>
>>>> Which means you don't have a clue as to the the dynamic voltage or
>>>> current nor do you have anything to measure acceleration.
>>>
>>> A video camera with a scale is sufficient to show that the centre of
>>> gravity accelerates with internal force.
>>
>> Utter nonsense.
>>
>> <snip delusional nonsense>
>>
>>> That was the point fool. To make a low voltage heavy armature gun making
>>> a very low resistance circuit. That is what makes it a brilliant new
>>> design, 100 times better than the old rail gun designs. Penisnino is
>>> such an ass that he does not know that 6 supercapacitors in series
>>> generate 6 times 2.7 volts or 16.2 Volts. Which when shorted give an
>>> average current of nearly 3000 amperes, enough for the purpose. With
>>> conventional rail gun design, the armature is light and the voltage is
>>> very high.
>>
>> More utter nonsense.
>
> No, it is the height of sense.
>>
>> With an applied voltage of 16.2 volts, the resistance would have to be
>> less than 0.0054 Ohms to get 3000 Amps. The actual resistance of such a
>> device is going to be in the range of somewhere between 0.1 and 0.5
>> Ohms,
>
> It is actually in the order of millions typically 5 milliohms or 0.05
> ohms.
And how could you possibly know that since it requires very special
equipment to measure milliohms?
>> but you have no way to know what it actually is as simple multimeters
>> can
>> not accurately measure resistences less than about 1 Ohm.
>
> We are not checking the resistance with meter. We are finding the
> average current from the force and knowing the average voltage we are
> finding it.
And how could you possibly know that since you have no equipment to
measure force even indirectly?
>
> About direct calculation from resistive path. The main circuit is thick
> copper with near zero resistance. The only resistance is at the contacts
> which are low thanks to the heavy weight of the armature. The heavy
> weight makes it a good short. Arindam spent years improving the contact
> and indeed that is crucial for further development.
Utter nonsense as you have no equipment capable of measuring resistances
of less than an Ohm.
> Check out the specs of the internal resistance of the super capacitors
> from the manufacturer. The internal resistance is below one milliohm
Totally irrelevant to anything from above.
>>
>> Trying to run a rail gun at low voltage is not something new or a new
>> discovery as the equations that describe the operation of a rail gun
>> have no limits on the applied voltage.
>
> It is absolutely new as no one did it before. Arindam's experiment is
> totally new as your consternation and ignorance show.
It has never been done because the equations that describe such an
apparatus clearly show using low voltage is blazingly stupid and you are
the first person stupid enough to do it.